2019
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-w15-89-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Generic 3d Standardisation Approach for the Netherlands Supporting Different Applications and Encodings

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> In this paper we present an open and flexible approach for the standardisation of 3D geographical data, describing our physical environment in such a way that it can serve different applications. The aim of our approach is to keep the standard as simple as possible so that implementation in different software is straightforward and the reuse of once collected 3D data in different domains is optimally supported. Therefore, we propose to model the semantics of real… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A public and internationally-accepted data standard may help. In this direction, pilot research has been implemented in the Netherlands, aiming for 3D data standardisation (Stoter et al, 2019). Second, generally speaking, it still lacks enough data support for 3D spatial analysis, such as ventilation animation and emergency management, which need abundant data on a subtle scale.…”
Section: Discussion: Major Scientific Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A public and internationally-accepted data standard may help. In this direction, pilot research has been implemented in the Netherlands, aiming for 3D data standardisation (Stoter et al, 2019). Second, generally speaking, it still lacks enough data support for 3D spatial analysis, such as ventilation animation and emergency management, which need abundant data on a subtle scale.…”
Section: Discussion: Major Scientific Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the most acknowledged and used open standards are CityGML by OGC (Section 2.2.1), for 3D city models, and IFC by buildingSMART for BIMs (Section 2.2.2). On a national level, there are specific models which often are based on, or at least linked to, the international standards [17,18]. Therefore, these open standards are being considered as reference guideline for investigating the GeoBIM integration in most studies (e.g., Sun et al [11], Daum et al [19]) and are chosen in a joint effort between OGC and buildingSMART to integrate geodata and BIM data.…”
Section: Interoperability and Standard Data Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Swedish two-layer approach could be compared to the ongoing standardization work of 3D geodata in the Netherlands. The authors of [63] want to simplify this standardization by proposing a three-layer approach. Here, the first layer is a conceptual model that to a large extent conforms to standards, e.g., CityGML and national standards.…”
Section: Information Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the third layer defines the encoding formats for data exchange, e.g., XML/GML, CityJSON, or JSON-LD (to allow linked data properties in JSON). The authors of [63] anticipate that such 3D standardization framework is more flexible and will thereby simplify the implementation of 3D city models.…”
Section: Information Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%