2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9020078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements, Development, and Evaluation of A National Building Standard—A Swedish Case Study

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present a proposal for a national building standard in Sweden. We define requirements for the proposed standard, e.g., it should support development of 3D city models, connect to building information models (BIM) and national registers and be based on a national classification system for the urban environment. Based on these requirements we develop an Application Domain Extension (ADE) of the building model in the proposed CityGML 3.0 standard denoted CityGML Sve-Test. CityGML 3.0 i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, the most acknowledged and used open standards are CityGML by OGC (Section 2.2.1), for 3D city models, and IFC by buildingSMART for BIMs (Section 2.2.2). On a national level, there are specific models which often are based on, or at least linked to, the international standards [17,18]. Therefore, these open standards are being considered as reference guideline for investigating the GeoBIM integration in most studies (e.g., Sun et al [11], Daum et al [19]) and are chosen in a joint effort between OGC and buildingSMART to integrate geodata and BIM data.…”
Section: Interoperability and Standard Data Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the most acknowledged and used open standards are CityGML by OGC (Section 2.2.1), for 3D city models, and IFC by buildingSMART for BIMs (Section 2.2.2). On a national level, there are specific models which often are based on, or at least linked to, the international standards [17,18]. Therefore, these open standards are being considered as reference guideline for investigating the GeoBIM integration in most studies (e.g., Sun et al [11], Daum et al [19]) and are chosen in a joint effort between OGC and buildingSMART to integrate geodata and BIM data.…”
Section: Interoperability and Standard Data Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter can be used, for example, for 3D cadastre units, enabling a connection between CityGML with the Land Administration Domain Model (International Organization for Standardization (ISO, 2012), without introducing an ADE (Sun, Olsson, Eriksson, & Harrie, 2020). CityGML version 3.0 has interesting features for establishing new national standards (Eriksson et al, 2020), but it is uncertain if this new standard will be able to address the technical interoperability issues evaluated in this benchmark. And there is a risk that the new features (even though interesting from several application perspectives) may even increase the complexity as highlighted in this study and therefore pose further interoperability challenges.…”
Section: Con Clus Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, the most acknowledged and used open standards are CityGML by OGC (Section 2.2.1), for 3D city models, and IFC by buildingSMART for BIM (Section 2.2.2). On a national level, there are specific models which often are based on, or at least linked to, the international standards [17,18]. Therefore, these open standards are being considered as reference guideline for investigating the GeoBIM integration in most studies (e.g.…”
Section: Interoperability and Standard Data Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%