2006
DOI: 10.1007/11774129_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Framework for Integrating Agile Development and User-Centred Design

Abstract: Abstract. Due to a number of similarities between user-centred design (UCD) and agile development, coupled with an appreciation that developers are rarely usability experts, it seems attractive to integrate these two approaches. However, although agile methods share some of the same aims as UCD, there are also distinct differences. These differences have made the use of these methods on development projects problematic. This paper reports a field study designed to investigate the use of agile methods alongside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
121
0
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
121
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…We can to some degree empirically confirm Chamberlain et al's (2006) conceptual work that agile development and user-centered design are compatible; user participation and agile development go well together. But user participation in our case was an integral part of the chosen methodology and thus no special attempt to integrate the two approaches, as Chamberlain et al demand it, was necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can to some degree empirically confirm Chamberlain et al's (2006) conceptual work that agile development and user-centered design are compatible; user participation and agile development go well together. But user participation in our case was an integral part of the chosen methodology and thus no special attempt to integrate the two approaches, as Chamberlain et al demand it, was necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…But user participation in our case was an integral part of the chosen methodology and thus no special attempt to integrate the two approaches, as Chamberlain et al demand it, was necessary. There were not two approaches, nor was there a distinction between designers and developers, which others (Chamberlain et al 2006;Sharp 2003, 2005) have found in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is mitigated through 'visioning' (Sy, 2007, Fox, 2008, da Silva et al, 2013, Schwartz, 2014 or 'sprint 0' (Patton, 2008). These activities are usually followed by 'Little Design Up Front' (Chamberlain et al, 2006) where designers originate enough assets to start development.…”
Section: Agile Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kent Beck and Alan Cooper (Nelson, 2002 cited by Sharp et al, 2006) as well as Bruce Archer (1999) expressed the synergetic potential of the two approaches with great foresight; right back to: 'Agile Competitors and Virtual Organisations' (Golman et al, cited by Archer, 1999) where the term first appeared in modern usage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%