2018
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31669
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward the potential cure of leukemias in the next decade

Abstract: Historically, progress in leukemia research has been slow, but it has accelerated recently as a result of understanding the pathophysiology of leukemias and implementing more effective and targeted therapies. This review summarizes the progress across leukemia subsets and projects the potential cure of most leukemias in the next decade. Cancer 2018;124:4301-4313.APL constitutes 5% to 10% of AML cases. It is characterized by the translocation between chromosomes 15 and 17-t(15,17)(q22; q12)-and the correspondin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(276 reference statements)
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical relevance of each gene included in all four panels is represented in Fig 2. The figure shows that ABL1, CALR, MPL, JAK2 and SF3B1 genes have diagnostic value, as described in several studies [2][18] [37]. Similarly, ABL1, CALR, JAK2, KIT, FLT3, IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations have FDA-approved treatments [56] [57]. Patients harboring mutations in TET2 and DNMT3A genes have been shown to present better response to hypomethylating agents [58] [59]; DNMT3 mutated patients could also benefit from daunorubicin induction therapy [60].…”
Section: Common Sequencing Errors Detected In the Ngs Panelsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The clinical relevance of each gene included in all four panels is represented in Fig 2. The figure shows that ABL1, CALR, MPL, JAK2 and SF3B1 genes have diagnostic value, as described in several studies [2][18] [37]. Similarly, ABL1, CALR, JAK2, KIT, FLT3, IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations have FDA-approved treatments [56] [57]. Patients harboring mutations in TET2 and DNMT3A genes have been shown to present better response to hypomethylating agents [58] [59]; DNMT3 mutated patients could also benefit from daunorubicin induction therapy [60].…”
Section: Common Sequencing Errors Detected In the Ngs Panelsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Improved remission rates of 90% to 100% for childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia over the past 4 decades have been achieved primarily through the optimization of established chemotherapeutic agents as opposed to the development of new therapies. 103 The 5-year relative survival rate for all cancers combined improved from 58% during the mid-1970s to 83% during 2008 through 2014 for children and from 68% to 85% for adolescents. 10 However, survival varies substantially by cancer type and age at diagnosis (Table 14).…”
Section: Cancer In Children and Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the prior efforts, the 5-year survival rates of leukemia are not high, especially among high-risk patients and in developing countries [28][29][30]. Indeed, the discovery of the activity of interferon α in 1983, and the later addition of homoharringtonine (now known as omacetaxine and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CML in 2012) and low-dose cytarabine resulted in a complete cytogenetic response rate (0% Ph-positive metaphases) of 20-30% and an improvement of the median survival to 6-7 years [31]. In standard medical and oncology textbooks, CLL is considered incurable [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In childhood ALL, the optimization of chemotherapy regimens over four decades, using mostly the same agents in improved combinations, has resulted in CR rates of 90-100% and potential cure rates of 80% or more. However, in adult ALL, the pediatric regimens have been modified over time to resemble the adult AML treatments, with a shorter duration of maintenance chemotherapy (long maintenance likely is responsible for an increased cure rate of 10-15%) and truncated classical postinduction consolidation in favor of early autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation [31]. These strategies have proven to be less successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%