Toward Sustainable Transportation: A Pavement Strategy Selection Based on the Extension of Dual-Hesitant Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods

Computational Intelligence

Zaidan

Alsattar³

et al. 2022

Self Cite

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a diverse group of conditions characterized by difficulty with social interaction and communication. ASD is expected to be a high‐risk disease. Recent studies have focused on the diagnosis based on sociodemographic and family characteristics factors. The development of a diagnosis model, which is primarily based on machine learning methods, has been carried out to alleviate the detection of autism. However, they neglected the importance of ASD features in a training dataset, especially because some features have different levels of contributions to the processing data and possess more relevancies to the classification information than others. Such limitations use preprocessing techniques for the construction of the machine learning model, but the role of the physician's experience towards feature contributions remains limited. However, for certain autism datasets, the relevancies of sociodemographic and family characteristic feature concerning the given class labels should be considered. Accordingly, this study developed a new machine learning model for the diagnosis of ASD based on multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM). By using three methodology phases, the model combines two representative theories, namely, MCDM and machine learning. The identification phase for imbalance ASD dataset and application of pre‐possessing stages by imputing missing values, feature selection of sociodemographic and family characteristics, and data imbalanced approach resulted in balanced ASD dataset, including 107,573 cases. The development phase for the new model was achieved by the proposed complex T‐spherical fuzzy‐weighted zero‐inconsistency (CT‐SFWZIC) method. CT‐SFWZIC was developed based on a new fuzzy set (i.e., complex T‐spherical fuzzy) for weighting affected features, and then applied for training and testing the machine learning model considering various complex T‐spherical fuzzy membership functions (i.e., T = 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10). The results obtained from a 10‐fold cross‐validation test for all T values by using nine machine learning classifiers were measured under seven evaluation metrics, namely AUC, accuracy, F1, precision, recall, training time (s), and test time (s). Performance evaluation results reveal that AdaBoost can be used to boost the ASD diagnosis as the best machine learning algorithm for all T values based on all metrics to improve the diagnosis based on physician's assessment. Under the most extreme evaluation metric, which is accuracy, the results of the AdaBoost classifiers for T = 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 have obtained 0.99948, 0.99934, 0.99930, 0.99939, 0.99910, and 0.99930, respectively.

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nonetheless, the inconsistency of their weighing techniques has not been addressed. [56][57][58][59][60][61][62] A fuzzy weighted with zero inconsistency (FWZIC) method has been introduced. 27 This method can calculate the weights of criteria with zero inconsistency.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards physician's experience: Development of machine learning model for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders based on complex T‐spherical fuzzy‐weighted zero‐inconsistency method

Computational Intelligence

Zaidan

Alsattar³

et al. 2022

Self Cite

“…Numerous subjective weighting methods have been proposed; however, when it comes to weighting criteria, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [40][41][42][43][44] and best-worst method (BWM) [45,46] methods have a high success rate. Nonetheless, the inconsistency issue of their weighing techniques has been addressed [17,37,[47][48][49][50][51]. Therefore, the fuzzy-weighted with zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) method has been introduced [52].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Diagnosis Models for Autism Patients Based on Medical and Sociodemographic Features Using Machine Learning and Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Techniques: An Evaluation and Benchmarking Framework

Alqaysi

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Hamid

2022

Background and Contexts. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is difficult to diagnose, prompting researchers to increase their efforts to find the best diagnosis by introducing machine learning (ML). Recently, several available challenges and issues have been highlighted for the diagnosis of ASD. High consideration must be taken into the feature selection (FS) approaches and classification process simultaneously by using medical tests and sociodemographic characteristic features in autism diagnostic. The constructed ML models neglected the importance of medical tests and sociodemographic features in a training and evaluation dataset, especially since some features have different contributions to the processing data and possess more relevancies to the classification information than others. However, the role of the physician’s experience towards feature contributions remains limited. In addition, the presence of many evaluation criteria, criteria trade-offs, and criteria importance categorize the evaluation and benchmarking of diagnosis ML models concerning the intersection between FS approaches and ML classification methods given under complex multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. To date, no study has presented an evaluation framework for benchmarking the best hybrid diagnosis models to classify autism patients’ emergency levels considering multicriteria evaluation solutions. Method. The three-phase framework integrated the MCDM and ML to develop the diagnosis models and evaluate and benchmark the best. Firstly, the new ASD-dataset-combined medical tests and sociodemographic characteristic features is identified and preprocessed. Secondly, developing the hybrid diagnosis models using the intersection process between three FS techniques and five ML algorithms introduces 15 models. The selected medical tests and sociodemographic features from each FS technique are weighted before feeding the five ML algorithms using the fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (FWZIC) method based on four psychiatry experts. Thirdly, (i) formulate a dynamic decision matrix for all developed models based on seven evaluation metrics, including classification accuracy, precision, F1 score, recall, test time, train time, and AUC. (ii) The fuzzy decision by opinion score method (FDOSM) is used to evaluate and benchmark the 15 models concerning the seven evaluation metrics. Results. Results reveal that (i) the three FS techniques have obtained a size different from the others in the number of the selected features; the sets were 39, 38, and 41 out of 48 features. Each set has its weights constructed by FWIZC. Considered sociodemographic features have been mostly selected more than medical tests within FS techniques. (ii) The first three best hybrid models were “ReF-decision tree,” “IG-decision tree,” and “Chi2-decision tree,” with score values 0.15714, 0.17539, and 0.29444. The best diagnosis model (ReF-decision tree) has obtained 0.4190, 0.0030, 0.9946, 0.9902, 0.9902, 0.9902, 0.9902, and 0.9951 for the C1=train time, C2=test time, C3=AUC, C4=CA, C5=F1 score, C6=precision, and C7=recall, respectively. The developed framework would be beneficial in advancing, accelerating, and selecting diagnosis tools in therapy with ASD. The selected model can identify severity as light, medium, or intense based on medical tests and sociodemographic weighted features.

“…FDOSM weighs the criteria values of each application implicitly and is limited to weighting each criterion explicitly. To solve this issue, FDOSM was supported by fuzzy-weighted zeroinconsistency (FWZIC), which is a powerful weighting MCDM method for providing exact weights for criteria with zero inconstancies [58][59][60][61][62][63]. FWZIC and FDOSM were used together to address the uncertainty and vagueness issues by integrating many fuzzy environments in complex case studies like COVID-19 vaccine distribution using Pythagorean fuzzy set [64], T-spherical fuzzy sets [65] and Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFS) [66].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hospital selection framework for remote MCD patients based on fuzzy q-rung orthopair environment

Alamoodi

Zaidan

et al. 2022

Neural Comput & Applic

Self Cite

This research proposes a novel mobile health-based hospital selection framework for remote patients with multi-chronic diseases based on wearable body medical sensors that use the Internet of Things. The proposed framework uses two powerful multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, namely fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency and fuzzy decision by opinion score method for criteria weighting and hospital ranking. The development of both methods is based on a Q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment to address the uncertainty issues associated with the case study in this research. The other MCDM issues of multiple criteria, various levels of significance and data variation are also addressed. The proposed framework comprises two main phases, namely identification and development. The first phase discusses the telemedicine architecture selected, patient dataset used and decision matrix integrated. The development phase discusses criteria weighting by q-ROFWZIC and hospital ranking by q-ROFDOSM and their sub-associated processes. Weighting results by q-ROFWZIC indicate that the time of arrival criterion is the most significant across all experimental scenarios with (0.1837, 0.183, 0.230, 0.276, 0.335) for (q = 1, 3, 5, 7, 10), respectively. Ranking results indicate that Hospital (H-4) is the best-ranked hospital in all experimental scenarios. Both methods were evaluated based on systematic ranking and sensitivity analysis, thereby confirming the validity of the proposed framework.