2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Solution-Processed High-Performance Polymer Solar Cells: from Material Design to Device Engineering

Abstract: With the rapid development of polymer solar cells (PSCs), the manufacture of high-performance large area PSC modules is becoming a critical issue in commercial applications. However, most of the reported light absorption materials and interfacial materials are quite thickness sensitive, with optimal thicknesses of around 100 and 5 nm, respectively. The thickness need to be precisely controlled, otherwise, a small variation in thickness can often lead to a sharp decrease in device performance, especially for in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To screen out a donor–acceptor combination with the best photovoltaic performance for further investigation on coating methods, we first take chloroform and a trace amount of diiodooctane (DIO, 0.5% in volume ratio)—which are commonly used as a main solvent and solvent additive, respectively—to make the solutions of the photoactive materials and fabricate the active layers by spin‐coating. The NF‐OSCs with a configuration of indium tin oxide (ITO)/poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene‐sulfonate)/polymer donor: NF acceptor/PFN‐Br/Al were fabricated (see Figure ), where PFN‐Br was used as the cathode interlayer, and later tested under simulated AM1.5G illumination with an intensity of 100 mW cm −2 . The weight ratio between the donor and the acceptor in the three types of blends was kept at 1:1, and the optimal thickness of the blend film was ≈100 nm.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters Of Nf‐oscs Based On the Pbta‐tf Blenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To screen out a donor–acceptor combination with the best photovoltaic performance for further investigation on coating methods, we first take chloroform and a trace amount of diiodooctane (DIO, 0.5% in volume ratio)—which are commonly used as a main solvent and solvent additive, respectively—to make the solutions of the photoactive materials and fabricate the active layers by spin‐coating. The NF‐OSCs with a configuration of indium tin oxide (ITO)/poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene‐sulfonate)/polymer donor: NF acceptor/PFN‐Br/Al were fabricated (see Figure ), where PFN‐Br was used as the cathode interlayer, and later tested under simulated AM1.5G illumination with an intensity of 100 mW cm −2 . The weight ratio between the donor and the acceptor in the three types of blends was kept at 1:1, and the optimal thickness of the blend film was ≈100 nm.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters Of Nf‐oscs Based On the Pbta‐tf Blenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Most of the investigations in the past decade have focused on the design and synthesis of highly efficient polymer donors, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] which leads to the fullerene-based devices with power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) over 10%. [1][2][3][4] Most of the investigations in the past decade have focused on the design and synthesis of highly efficient polymer donors, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] which leads to the fullerene-based devices with power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) over 10%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to overcome these problems is to develop new coating methods to precisely control the film thickness and achieve highly uniform active layer over large area . An alternative way is to adopt active layer materials that retain high performance over a very wide range of thicknesses to supply a wide processing window for large area coating techniques . Highly efficient thickness insensitive solar cells have been realized with few organic materials systems only when the active layer is deposited at elevated temperatures; because of the enhanced intermolecular interactions at low temperatures often resulting in too large domains.…”
Section: Performances Of Low Vacuum (Lv) and High Vacuum (Hv) Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%