1972
DOI: 10.1016/0031-8914(72)90213-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward simple powers of T in the Kondo effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For temperatures below ∼0.6 K, the resistivity of the underdoped samples clearly follows a T 2 temperature dependence (inset of Fig. 1d ), as expected for Kondo-like behavior [ 31 , 32 ]. The good agreement with the NRG, NCA and Hamann predictions proves exclusively the Kondo mechanism and leaves little room for alternative interpretation in the underdoped region, which also confirms that the local moment is roughly spin-1/2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For temperatures below ∼0.6 K, the resistivity of the underdoped samples clearly follows a T 2 temperature dependence (inset of Fig. 1d ), as expected for Kondo-like behavior [ 31 , 32 ]. The good agreement with the NRG, NCA and Hamann predictions proves exclusively the Kondo mechanism and leaves little room for alternative interpretation in the underdoped region, which also confirms that the local moment is roughly spin-1/2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…T h e above analysis shows that they break down below TK. The situation is even worse for the ground state models, where drastic deviations from experiment were found (Star et al 1972) ; the good agreement claimed by Heeger (1969) is caused by impurity interaction effects.…”
Section: Properties Of the Kondo Resonancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the logarithmic region of the resistivity curve (p a In T) annealing produced only small changes in the temperature dependence of the resistivity. Defining F as the logarithmic slope of the resistivity curve at 16 K, F=-(dp/d In T)I16K (1) annealing to 70 K did not change F within experimental error; annealing to 270 K produced at most a 20% increase in F (Table II). Sharma and Chari have reported qualitatively similar results on bulk Cu(Fe) alloys.m1…”
Section: Cu(fe) Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%