Applications of Digital Image Processing XXVI 2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.512550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward perceptual metrics for video watermark evaluation

Abstract: Assessing and comparing the performance of watermarking algorithms is difficult. The visibility of the watermark is an important aspect in this process. In this paper, we propose two metrics for evaluating the visual impact of video watermarks. Based on several different watermarking algorithms and video sequences, we identify the most prominent impairments as spatial noise and temporal flicker. We design the corresponding measurement algorithms and corroborate their performance through subjective experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance of the hiding scheme using different number of channels and varying compression parameters: "Bits per frame" and "FER" denote the per-frame data embedding rate and "frame error rate", respectively. The perceptual measures "Noise" (spatial noise) and "Flicker" 9 and PSNR (in dB) are averaged over all the frames. As seen from Table 1, using a higher number of channels, we are able to embed about 20% more data while the frame error rate is also reduced.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of the hiding scheme using different number of channels and varying compression parameters: "Bits per frame" and "FER" denote the per-frame data embedding rate and "frame error rate", respectively. The perceptual measures "Noise" (spatial noise) and "Flicker" 9 and PSNR (in dB) are averaged over all the frames. As seen from Table 1, using a higher number of channels, we are able to embed about 20% more data while the frame error rate is also reduced.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the gradient of the difference between the original and translated values is low, the distortion has a small upper bound. The second effect of a video watermark is "flickering" [27] caused by the insertion of different watermarking data in successive frames. If the watermark remains constant, it can be removed by averaging a sequence of frames with varied backgrounds [24].…”
Section: Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] PSNR 1.0000 0.1421 0.1705 -0.0091 Fan et al [7] 1.0000 0.8696 0.2959 Drelie et al [8] 1.0000 0.2043 Winkler et al [9] 1.0000 Table 1. Cross-correlations of metric outputs for JPEG2000 EBCOT-coded sequence at 0.50bpp.…”
Section: Flickering: Metrics and Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last metric we evaluated was proposed by Winkler et al in [9]. It uses the 2D Fourier Transform to perform frequency analysis of the signal and then calculates two sub-metrics for low and high frequencies.…”
Section: Flickering: Metrics and Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%