2013
DOI: 10.1509/jppm.12.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Marketplace Diversity: A Multimeasure, Multidimensional Study of the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing

Abstract: To reflect greater marketplace diversity and inclusion, journals must publish research that engages a broader repertoire of intellectual resources and approaches. The authors examine how Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPPM) contributes to this area from a multimeasure, multidimensional perspective. This research illustrates how JPPM's composition of diversity has changed over time and provides insight into how JPPM successfully fulfills its mission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a recent review of the marketing literature across key marketing journals since their inception, found only 27 studies that focused on African-Americans (Pittman 2017)the largest racial minority group in the US (U.S. Census Bureau 2016). These recent findings parallel those of prior reviews of marketing literature which similarly demonstrate a lack of consumption research with a racial or ethnic focus (Williams 1995;Grier and Kumanyika 2008;Williams, Lee, and Henderson 2008;DeBerry-Spence et al 2013;Adeigbe et al 2015;Davis Forthcoming). Generally, academic research in marketing lacks scholarship which addresses the diversity of groups, topics and domains which relate to race.…”
Section: Race a Marketplace Icon?supporting
confidence: 73%
“…For example, a recent review of the marketing literature across key marketing journals since their inception, found only 27 studies that focused on African-Americans (Pittman 2017)the largest racial minority group in the US (U.S. Census Bureau 2016). These recent findings parallel those of prior reviews of marketing literature which similarly demonstrate a lack of consumption research with a racial or ethnic focus (Williams 1995;Grier and Kumanyika 2008;Williams, Lee, and Henderson 2008;DeBerry-Spence et al 2013;Adeigbe et al 2015;Davis Forthcoming). Generally, academic research in marketing lacks scholarship which addresses the diversity of groups, topics and domains which relate to race.…”
Section: Race a Marketplace Icon?supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Interestingly, only 114 (8.5%) out of 1335 authors produced single authors works, with 17 (34.7%) of the 49 leading authors (mentioned in Table 4) publishing at least one single author article, although only two of the most highly-cited 25 articles were single author works. This suggests there has been an increase in collaborative research within the domain, which is important in terms of sharing ideas, understanding varying perspectives originating from different specialisations, identifying interesting and relevant research problems, conducting and validating field surveys, and deriving substantial conclusions (DeBerry-Spence et al, 2013; Katz and Martin, 1997; Pitt, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the variety of methodological approaches used within the studies, we first classified articles as empirical, conceptual, and other (e.g., invited commentary). We further categorized the empirical category into three subcategoriesquantitative, qualitative, and mixed method-adopted from DeBerry-Spence, Ekpo, Adelakun, and Gunay (2013). Lastly, we closely examined the data collection and analysis methods of each article.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%