2015
DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1018062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward an infrastructural critique of urban change: Obsolescence and changing perceptions of New York City's waterfront

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, researchers have analysed infrastructures to illuminate political economic questions concerning the rescaling of the state, economic globalisation and uneven sociospatial development. Boris Vormann (2015 ), for example, points to how the redevelopment and possible improvement of a particular urban area (in his article, New York City's waterfront) needs to be understood in the context of the restructuring and possible decline in cities and regions elsewhere (in his article, container port areas in New Jersey). As he puts it: ''the costs of the new accumulation regime have simply been relocated in a new infrastructural regime.…”
Section: Infrastructural Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, researchers have analysed infrastructures to illuminate political economic questions concerning the rescaling of the state, economic globalisation and uneven sociospatial development. Boris Vormann (2015 ), for example, points to how the redevelopment and possible improvement of a particular urban area (in his article, New York City's waterfront) needs to be understood in the context of the restructuring and possible decline in cities and regions elsewhere (in his article, container port areas in New Jersey). As he puts it: ''the costs of the new accumulation regime have simply been relocated in a new infrastructural regime.…”
Section: Infrastructural Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numa leitura sociotécnica, os suportes infraestruturais do território são instrumentos de coesão e de integração (Offner, 1996;Coutard, 2010;Neuman & Smith, 2010), mas também de diferenciação e exclusão no acesso à mobilidade e a diversos serviços urbanos (Graham & Marvin, 2001;Vormann, 2015). A introdução de infraestruturas de transporte mecanizadas no século XIX trouxe implicações profundas num espaço territorial que era caracterizado pela rugosidade topográfica e pela fricção do movimento, modelada por obstáculos, limites e (des)continuidades naturais.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified