Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability 2002
DOI: 10.1145/957205.957214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward achieving universal usability for older adults through multimodal feedback

Abstract: This experiment examines the effect of combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop computer task. Participants completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (3 unimodal, 3 bimodal, 1 trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. For analyses of results, participants were grouped based on their level of computer experience. All users performed well under auditory-hapt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, interactions should not require physical dexterity or heavy cognitive processing (Kurniawan and Zaphiris, 2005). To minimize the need for extensive learning and memory, appropriate modes of control, feedback, and instructions must be provided (Emery et al, 2003;Mynatt and Rogers, 2001). For example, use of touch screens may reduce workload by providing a clear match between display and control Wood, Willoughby, Rushing, Bechtel, and Gilbert, 2005).…”
Section: Usability: Ease Of Learning and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, interactions should not require physical dexterity or heavy cognitive processing (Kurniawan and Zaphiris, 2005). To minimize the need for extensive learning and memory, appropriate modes of control, feedback, and instructions must be provided (Emery et al, 2003;Mynatt and Rogers, 2001). For example, use of touch screens may reduce workload by providing a clear match between display and control Wood, Willoughby, Rushing, Bechtel, and Gilbert, 2005).…”
Section: Usability: Ease Of Learning and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies recognize that there is a need to design websites that are accessible and usable for elder adults (Wagner et al, 2010;Riman, Ghusn, & Monacelli, 2011;Emery et al, 2003;Lin, Neafsey, & Strickler, 2009). Research shows that websites often do not accommodate elder users as they experience only half of what younger users encounter (Coyne and Nielsen, 2002).…”
Section: Elder Adult and Website Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, familiar words were used along with jargon and technical terminology. Also, buttons were used when possible as studies show that elder adults prefer buttons over text and image links (Wagner et al, 2010;Riman, Ghusn, & Monacelli, 2011;Emery et al, 2003;Lin, Neafsey, & Strickler, 2009). To take away any confusion on the button's destination, specific keywords on the navigation buttons were added, such as "Read Next Post" or "Read Previous Post" (Figure 19).…”
Section: Content and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback is essential and reduces ambiguity about system state. Moreover, multiple types of feedback, when combined, can enhance the usability of a mobile touch-interface [34] [35]. Hence, the interaction is enhanced by visual (highlighting visual buttons when touched) and tactile feedback (vibration) to confirm performed actions.…”
Section: Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%