The Cognitive Neurosciences 2020
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11442.003.0124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Socially Responsible, Transparent, and Reproducible Cognitive Neuroscience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the generalizability of such second language studies to native language processing remains unclear, these findings raise the possibility that participant individual differences may account for some of our findings. As pointed out by a reviewer, this concern might be mitigated by the fact that our sample for this study was relatively large (N = 56), had a representative mean age above that of the typical college student population (M age = 26.61, SD age = 3.93), and was not extremely unbalanced in terms of gender (with 24 male and 32 female participants); nevertheless, we believe that explicitly recognizing these relevant idiosyncrasies in our sample represents a move towards a more transparent, reproducible, and socially responsible neuroscience (Ashburn et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the generalizability of such second language studies to native language processing remains unclear, these findings raise the possibility that participant individual differences may account for some of our findings. As pointed out by a reviewer, this concern might be mitigated by the fact that our sample for this study was relatively large (N = 56), had a representative mean age above that of the typical college student population (M age = 26.61, SD age = 3.93), and was not extremely unbalanced in terms of gender (with 24 male and 32 female participants); nevertheless, we believe that explicitly recognizing these relevant idiosyncrasies in our sample represents a move towards a more transparent, reproducible, and socially responsible neuroscience (Ashburn et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%