Development of Professional Expertise 2009
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511609817.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Second Training Revolution: Promise and Pitfalls of Digital Experiential Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, even with these, there are no guarantees. It has been noted that even the most authentic of simulations cannot necessarily prepare military personnel for the actualities of combat (Chatham, 2009). Nevertheless, simulations can provide access to understanding processes such as manufacturing which otherwise would be difficult to access (Hamalainen et al., 2018).…”
Section: Accessing and Securing The Conceptual Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, even with these, there are no guarantees. It has been noted that even the most authentic of simulations cannot necessarily prepare military personnel for the actualities of combat (Chatham, 2009). Nevertheless, simulations can provide access to understanding processes such as manufacturing which otherwise would be difficult to access (Hamalainen et al., 2018).…”
Section: Accessing and Securing The Conceptual Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To have challenges that increase the effort put into the training sessions is a well-known fact in games research, but we still see a drive toward “instructor-less training” (Chatham, 2009), a drive that ignores the coaching part. Of course, to some extent, the game AI could act as a coach, but for certain learning objectives, that kind of AI is still far from as versatile and flexible as a human coach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase most often ignored by researchers is the activities of the instructor during simulation or play. However, even the most convinced advocates of “instructor-less training” admit that instructors need to be present during training, at least to make sure that the trainees are interpreting the game appropriately (Chatham, 2009; Salas et al, 2009). Other relevant activities can be summarized as progress monitoring, in which the instructor follows the trainees’ progress during play, takes notes for the debriefing session, and gives continuous feedback on training aspects that can be immediately taken into account by the trainee(s).…”
Section: Coaching Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation