2007
DOI: 10.1080/01944360708977978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Methodology for Measuring the Security of Publicly Accessible Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our findings provide evidence-based insights into the extent to which different users of public space interpret security policies differently (Coaffee et al, 2009). In order to mitigate the negative feelings that are associated with security measures in some people's minds, Nemeth and Schmidt (2007) suggest that urban planners and designers create a balance between personal safety in publicly accessible places and freedom of use. Based on the assumption that a higher number of people in a public space creates greater feelings of safety and security (Siegel, 1992), urban designers and planners should consider enhancing the accessibility and desirability of public places by adding amenities likely to encourage use by a wide range of people such as public restrooms, food vendors, flexible seating, sculptures, sun or nighttime lighting, and trees (Nemeth and Schmidt, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our findings provide evidence-based insights into the extent to which different users of public space interpret security policies differently (Coaffee et al, 2009). In order to mitigate the negative feelings that are associated with security measures in some people's minds, Nemeth and Schmidt (2007) suggest that urban planners and designers create a balance between personal safety in publicly accessible places and freedom of use. Based on the assumption that a higher number of people in a public space creates greater feelings of safety and security (Siegel, 1992), urban designers and planners should consider enhancing the accessibility and desirability of public places by adding amenities likely to encourage use by a wide range of people such as public restrooms, food vendors, flexible seating, sculptures, sun or nighttime lighting, and trees (Nemeth and Schmidt, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Government-owned lands cannot always be accessed by the public, while privately owned and controlled land often appears to have public character (Voyce, 2006). Thus, locations that constitute public space vary along a continuum ranging from public to private, and can be categorised according to concepts of ownership, management and accessibility (Nemeth & Schmidt, 2007). Ray Oldenburg coined the term "third places" to describe "a generic designation for a great variety of public places that host the regular, voluntary, informal and happily anticipated gatherings of individuals beyond the realms of home and work" (Oldenburg, 1989, p. 16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we utilize an index that operationalizes levels of control or openness in publicly accessible space (Németh and Schmidt, 2007), as discussed earlier. The index groups spatial management techniques into 10 that encourage freedom of access, use and behavior, and 10 that actively discourage freedom of access, use or behavior (see Table 1 for a list, but see Appendices A and B for a full description).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, we rely on previous studies that have attempted to empirically quantify the design, management and use of public space. Németh and Schmidt (2007) construct an index to operationalize the management of public space. The index groups spatial management techniques into those that encourage freedom of access, use and behavior, and those which actively discourage freedom of access, use or behavior.…”
Section: Privately Owned Public Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%