2017
DOI: 10.1080/15420353.2017.1308291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Linked Data Model for Describing Cartographic Resources

Abstract: GEOGRAPHIC FIELDS IN MARC CODE 001 4021425 005 20130829110002.0 008 121009s2013 txu bk 001 0 eng c 010 __ |a 2012041446 035 __ |a (OCoLC)ocn813301036 040 __ |a TXA/DLC |c DLC |d TXA 043 __ |a n-us-tx 049 __ |a TXAM 050 00 |a ML3477.8.D35 |b G68 2013 082 00 |a 781.6409764/2812 |2 23 100 1_ |a Govenar, Alan B., |d 1952-245 10 |a Deep Ellum : |b the other side of Dallas / |c Alan Govenar and Jay Brakefield. 250 __ |a 1st Texas A&M University Press ed. 260 __ |a College Station : |b Texas A&M University Press, |c … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Libraries usually disseminate their LD innovations to others. For example, the LD4P Cartographic Materials Working Group communicates and shares project output in the form of: “a paper with project outcomes and future research recommendations, cartographic concept modeling recommendation papers, a published BIBFRAME 2.0 plus extensions ontology, a set of cartographic resource descriptions based on the BIBFRAME 2.0 plus extensions profile, and public presentations and published articles about the project.” (McGee, Durante, & Weimer, 2017) University of North Texas (UNT) Libraries created a name APP, which contains authority records in LD format. They released the source code of the name APP under an Open Source License and also published the name authority file as five star LOD.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libraries usually disseminate their LD innovations to others. For example, the LD4P Cartographic Materials Working Group communicates and shares project output in the form of: “a paper with project outcomes and future research recommendations, cartographic concept modeling recommendation papers, a published BIBFRAME 2.0 plus extensions ontology, a set of cartographic resource descriptions based on the BIBFRAME 2.0 plus extensions profile, and public presentations and published articles about the project.” (McGee, Durante, & Weimer, 2017) University of North Texas (UNT) Libraries created a name APP, which contains authority records in LD format. They released the source code of the name APP under an Open Source License and also published the name authority file as five star LOD.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the topic of metadata is strongly accented in geosciences. The description of an application accompanied by metadata is the most common one (Di et al, 2009;Ho et al, 2011;Maue et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2013;Da Silva et al, 2014;Kalantari et al, 2014;Hu et al, 2015;Lafia et al, 2016;Palma et al, 2016;Reznik et al, 2016;McGee et al, 2017;Neumaier et al, 2018). Such papers mostly deal with an explicitly defined scope, like the integration of open linked metadata into cloud platforms, sensor webs, geovisual analytics, Volunteer Geographic Information, e-government, libraries for geo-resources, cartographic models, and Web services.…”
Section: Methods and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation seems to be a result of the rigidness of the geo community. With the exception of a pioneers, we can see a lack of best practice (Hu et al, 2015;Di et al, 2009;Ho et al, 2011;Narock and Fox, 2012;Kalantari et al, 2014;Wilson et al, 2014;Lafia et al, 2016;McGee et al, 2017;Da Silva et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2013;Maue et al, 2012;Neumaier et al, 2018). The geo community, having reached a peak with respect to the use of non-semantic metadata approaches (i.e.…”
Section: Weak Support In Geosciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGee et al. (2017) discussed the core ontology of LD4L (Linked Data for Libraries) project, constructed for describing geographic information resources using Linked Open Data (LOD). This ontology employs the ontology definition in BIBFRAME and expands the definitions on type, spatial range, scale, spatial reference system, and other aspects of cartographic resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%