2017
DOI: 10.1166/asl.2017.10017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a Customer Knowledge Management Model for Enhancing Enterprise Software Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by the results of the review [68], According to [69,70], all of the antecedent factors in the high priority group have high iteration in the literature. In [71] shows that CKM was used in a variety of contexts [72,73,74] provided evidence and supports our findings, since all high priority factors were already used in IT companies. This study's findings are similar to past findings, but this study is more comprehensive and considers the entire CKM antecedent factors mentioned in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is supported by the results of the review [68], According to [69,70], all of the antecedent factors in the high priority group have high iteration in the literature. In [71] shows that CKM was used in a variety of contexts [72,73,74] provided evidence and supports our findings, since all high priority factors were already used in IT companies. This study's findings are similar to past findings, but this study is more comprehensive and considers the entire CKM antecedent factors mentioned in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For the present study, the 5 steps presented by Whittemore and Knafl [24] were followed (1. problem identification; 2. literature research; 3. data evaluation; 4. data analysis; and 5. presentation). The changes adopted by dos Santos Figueiro, Aparecida Prim, and Aparecida Dandolini [25] for steps 3 and 4 were also considered for this analysis, which included a set of yes/no questions that led to a percentage of matching (extracted from Khosravi et al [34] and Ghobadi [35]), and the creation of a qualitative data matrix to summarize the content of the selected references (extracted from Braun et al [36]), accordingly.…”
Section: Step-by-step Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3: As far as 2 fields of study are concerned, the percentage of adherence or matching increased from 50% [25,34,35] to 75% for a total of 6 steps for proximity and 6 steps for the design for all questions. This proportion would guarantee that both fields are covered to an acceptable extent, while the original 50% would only assure fitting with one of them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, customer knowledge has been categorized as knowledge about, knowledge from, and knowledge for the consumer (Wilde,2011;Khosravi et al,2017). Knowledge about the customer is customer-oriented knowledge and includes details about the customer's purchasing and payment habits, as well as his motivations, preferences, and needs.…”
Section: Customer Knowledge Management (Ckm)mentioning
confidence: 99%