2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
156
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
156
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with prior studies that use time urgency and workload as measures of challenge-related stressors (Beehr et al, 2001;Boswell et al, 2004; Page 18 of 41 Podsakoff et al, 2007;Webster et al, 2010). However, in terms of interactive effect, while both employee involvement and challenge-related stressors were found to strongly and positively influence perceptions of job satisfaction, the hypothesised two-way interaction (Hypothesis 2) did not further strengthen the positive relationship between perceived challenge-related stressors and job satisfaction.…”
Section: --------------------------Insert Table 5 and Figure 1 About Hesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with prior studies that use time urgency and workload as measures of challenge-related stressors (Beehr et al, 2001;Boswell et al, 2004; Page 18 of 41 Podsakoff et al, 2007;Webster et al, 2010). However, in terms of interactive effect, while both employee involvement and challenge-related stressors were found to strongly and positively influence perceptions of job satisfaction, the hypothesised two-way interaction (Hypothesis 2) did not further strengthen the positive relationship between perceived challenge-related stressors and job satisfaction.…”
Section: --------------------------Insert Table 5 and Figure 1 About Hesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, evidence for the relationship between challenge type stressors and job satisfaction is inconclusive. While some studies report a positive effect (Beehr, Glaser, Canali, & Wallwey, 2001;Boswell, Olson-Buchanan, & LePine, 2004;LePine et al, 2005;Podsakoff et al, 2007;Webster, Beehr, & Christiansen, 2010), others find the relationship to be negative or insignificant (e.g., de Lange, Taris, Kompier, Houtman, & Bongers, 2004;Doest & Jonge, 2006). Thus, we believe it is important to provide further evidence of the additive and interactive effects of challenge stress upon job satisfaction.…”
Section: Page 4 Of 41mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The examination of indirect effects in stress studies is recommended and highlighted by many stress researchers, including Donald et al (2005); Kelloway, Teed and Kelley (2008);and Webster, Beehr and Christiansen (2009). The present study contributes to the body of knowledge regarding stress and productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The R 2 of Model 1 is 0.335, which indicates that the model explains 33.5% of the variances in predicting individual productivity. In step 2, commitment is entered into the existing Webster et al 2009;Yahaya et al 2009). Academic administrators at MRUs that suffer from stress based on the occupational stressors examined in the present study appear to exhibit lower commitment.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Elsewhere, physical and psychological strain mediate job demands and performance [27]. Stressors types of challenge and hindrance and outcomes of behaviors of organizational citizenship and job performance are partially mediated through physical symptoms of strains [39]. Health partially mediates the relationship between stressor-individual productivity relationships [40].…”
Section: The Role Of Health In the Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%