Tourism Diplomacy: A Feasible Tool of Building Nation’s Image through Tourism Resources. A Study on Bangladesh

doi:10.7176/ejbm/12-24-10

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tourists' positive and negative affective states, which can influence people's ability to deal with negative information and self-positivity biases, are among the affective factors (Godovykh et al, 2021). A tourism destination can promote resources and solve related crises or problems through peaceful negotiation between nations using the peaceful power of tourism (Chandra Kuri et al, 2020). As a result, tourism diplomacy helps manage and develop Iran's DI and identity (Papageorgiou & Papagianni, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Future scenarios for improving Iran's overall destination image and attractiveness: A supply‐side perspective

Nematpour

Khodadadi

Makian

et al. 2022

Futures & Foresight Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since overall image and attractiveness can play a key role in developing a destination's tourism market, the current study attempts to identify the main factors influencing Iran's overall image and attractiveness from a supply-side perspective. To reduce the uncertainties in Iran's future tourism market development, we first used factor analysis to identify factors that affect Iran's tourism market. Second, we used multiple linear regressions to examine the relationships between the identified factors and Iran's overall image and attractiveness as a destination. According to the findings, political, product, and service factors significantly affect Iran's overall image and attractiveness. Third, we provided scenarios for improving Iran's overall image and attractiveness based on cross-impact balanced analysis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Future scenarios for improving Iran's overall destination image and attractiveness: A supply‐side perspective

Nematpour

Khodadadi

Makian

et al. 2022

Futures & Foresight Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other researchers have considered culture in the context of public diplomacy (Scott-Smith, 2020;Zaharna, 2020). A significant number of scholars have paid attention to various aspects of cultural diplomacy as a practice of using culture to realize the national interests of the state and ensure its participation in global governance (Cull, 2010;Espada, 2020;Constantinou, 2018;Bulur, 2016;Murray, 2018;Banikamal & Ra'ees, 2018;Turchetti & Lalli, 2020;Brown, 2020;Berrin, 2021;Kuri, et al, 2020;Winter, 2017;Rockower, 2020;Dubé-Senécal, 2022;Hjorthén, 2023;Kaya & Drhimeur, 2023). An analysis of the works on the role and place of culture in international relations has made it possible to state the lack of research on the technological dimension of cultural global governance.…”

Section: Review Of Previous Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At this level, we can distinguish cultural diplomacy as an institutionalized practice that is well understood in the scientific literature (Mark, 2010;Gienow-Hecht & Donfried, 2010;Goff, 2020). Within cultural diplomacy, there are music diplomacy (Espada, 2020), cinema diplomacy (Cull, 2010), visual diplomacy (Constantinou, 2018), fashion diplomacy (Dubé-Senécal, 2022;Bulur, 2016), arts diplomacy (Brown, 2020), sports diplomacy (Murray, 2018), educational diplomacy (Banikamal & Ra'ees, 2018), science diplomacy (Turchetti & Lalli, 2020), exhibition diplomacy (Berrin, 2021;Hjorthén, 2023), tourism diplomacy (Kuri, et al, 2020), heritage diplomacy (Winter, 2017), religious diplomacy (Religious soft diplomacy..., 2021; Kaya & Drhimeur, 2023), gastrodiplomacy (Rockower, 2020).…”

Section: Geocultural Technologies As a Means Of International Communi...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Theory of geocultural technologies in international relations

Vysotskyi¹,

Holovko²,

Vysotska³

2023

Journ. Geol., Geogr., and Geoec..

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of the theory of geocultural technologies is an attempt to integrate various theories and practices of foreign policy cultural activities of states on the world stage within the framework of a generalizing scientific vision, as well as to rethink international relations on the basis of geographical and cultural determinism, as well as the technological approach. The constitutive basis of the theory of geocultural technologies in international relations is the idea that the subordination of social actors to power is determined by its cultural attractiveness for them and leads to their further internalization, immersion in the cultural and symbolic interpretive matrix that justifies and justifies power in its geocultural originality. The complementary application of geographical, civilizational, cultural, deterministic, communicative and technological approaches has made it possible to outline the contours of the theory of geocultural technologies in international relations, to interpret effective practices of cultural engagement in the local, regional and global dimensions as geocultural technologies. Today, the problem of global cultural governance is increasingly coming to the fore among scholars. By actively participating in global cultural governance, states can not only realize their national interests, but also build the world of the future in accordance with their long-term strategies and culturally determined ideals of coexistence in the context of further increasing interdependence between peoples. In this sense, geocultural technologies are effective means of global cultural governance. The multidimensional nature and manifestations of geocultural technologies as effective practices in the international arena for the dissemination of geocultures allows them to be considered as means of international communication, as tools for public diplomacy, as means of cultural diplomacy, as soft power, as propaganda, and as legitimization. Thanks to geocultural technologies, a global transculture is being formed, which is a synthesis of ideas, images, and material things from different geocul- tures. Geocultures are defined as historically ordered sets of symbols, values, ideals, ideas, language practices, religious traditions, technologies of reproduction and transformation of social relations that embody the spirit of a particular geographical part of the world. Geoculture is inherent in any civilizational community or national-political entity.

show abstract

Tourism Diplomacy: A Feasible Tool of Building Nation’s Image through Tourism Resources. A Study on Bangladesh

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Future scenarios for improving Iran's overall destination image and attractiveness: A supply‐side perspective

Future scenarios for improving Iran's overall destination image and attractiveness: A supply‐side perspective

Theory of geocultural technologies in international relations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About