2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tough hydrogels with tunable soft and wet interfacial adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the underlying physics governing each microscopic source to viscoelastic behavior is different, we expect the expression of the timescale for each phenomenon at the macroscale to be similar. With this caveat, a number of physical networks (whose primary source of viscoelasticity is due to bond dynamics) have been shown to exhibit similar behaviors to that predicted by the model. , For instance, the trends observed by Ding et al for an ionic polymer network match the qualitative predictions of the model (Figure b). We particularly note the distinct discontinuity observed between each loading cycle, which is commonly observed in viscoelastic polymers, but is not captured by many existing models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Even though the underlying physics governing each microscopic source to viscoelastic behavior is different, we expect the expression of the timescale for each phenomenon at the macroscale to be similar. With this caveat, a number of physical networks (whose primary source of viscoelasticity is due to bond dynamics) have been shown to exhibit similar behaviors to that predicted by the model. , For instance, the trends observed by Ding et al for an ionic polymer network match the qualitative predictions of the model (Figure b). We particularly note the distinct discontinuity observed between each loading cycle, which is commonly observed in viscoelastic polymers, but is not captured by many existing models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Figure c,d shows the evaluation of the adhesive force of asymmetry characteristics through the peel test on the skin of the prepared film. The adhesion energy was defined as F ave /w and calculated from the adhesion–displacement curve . The adhesion energy of the upper surface was 40 J/m 2 and that of the lower surface was approximately 4 J/m 2 ; thus, demonstrating strongly asymmetric adhesion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adhesion energy was defined as F ave /w and calculated from the adhesion−displacement curve. 36 The adhesion energy of the upper surface was 40 J/m 2 and that of the lower surface was approximately 4 J/m 2 ; thus, demonstrating strongly asymmetric adhesion. Moreover, HA-based elastomers were created to be soft, with asymmetric adhesion, without changing the processing protocol in a major way.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Casting Solution Compositionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The measured interfacial toughness was ~3,900 J/m 2 (Fig. 6(f)), which is much higher than that of the tendon-bone, cartilage-bone interface [43,44], and most hydrogel-substrate interfaces [16,19,35,36,[45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Binding Performance Between Hydrogel Layer And...mentioning
confidence: 90%