2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total mandibular reconstruction after resection of rare “honeycomb-like” ameloblastic carcinoma – A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jeremic et al (12) proposed the use of parotid gland resection and regional lymph node dissection to achieve adequate margins. Angiero et al (5) argued that since metastases is able to occur via the blood stream, cervical lymph node dissection should not be routinely performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeremic et al (12) proposed the use of parotid gland resection and regional lymph node dissection to achieve adequate margins. Angiero et al (5) argued that since metastases is able to occur via the blood stream, cervical lymph node dissection should not be routinely performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the use of cervical lymph node dissection with ameloblastic carcinoma is under review. Jeremic et al (12) proposed the use of parotid gland resection and regional lymph node dissection to achieve adequate margins. Angiero et al (5) argued that since metastases is able to occur via the blood stream, cervical lymph node dissection should not be routinely performed.…”
Section: Cure Rate N (%) -------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to prognosis, both present patients have had no recurrences and metastases so far. Appropriate treatments for ameloblastic carcinoma should include radical local resection of the primary lesion, with taking more than a 1‐3 cm safe margin . The present patients underwent a marginal resection, taking a safety margin of 2 cm immediately after diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although classification of ameloblastic carcinoma has been simplified as a single entity according to WHO classification of odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors in 2017, it is because both types have similar histological features and clinical behavior and they recognize the existence of two different types of amoloblastic carcinoma . Histopathologically, the diagnostic criteria for ameloblastic carcinoma are based on cytological atypia and an increased mitotic index with malignancy . However, when ameloblastic carcinoma arises de novo, the diagnosis may not be simple because several malignant tumors such as squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, or epidermoid carcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%