Total factor productivity growth in Central and Eastern Europe before, during and after the global financial crisis

Abstract

This article presents growth accounting results for 11 EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe for the years 1996-2016. Its contributions include the estimation of new capital stock series and adjustment for the utilisation of capital stock. Before the crisis, growth in total factor productivity (TFP) was the main contributor to output growth in Slovenia, Hungary and Slovakia, while capital deepening was more important in the Czech Republic, Croatia and Poland. During the global financial crisis the contributions of TFP and capital growth differed markedly across the countries, reflecting the very diverse dynamics of the crisis. After the crisis the contribution of TFP growth has been negligible in all of the sample countries coinciding with generally weak output growth. The results are generally robust to changes in estimation methods and parametrisations, but some assumptions regarding the construction of the capital stock series are critical for the results.

The dynamics of trade margins: Evidence from the European integration

“…Note that by computing correlations, we do not intend to assign any causality implications, but rather to summarize this large data set. For robustness purposes, besides AMECO data we also use the TFP values estimated by Levenko et al (2017).…”

Social convergence of the Baltic states within the enlarged EU: Is limited social dialogue an impediment?

“…While decreasing population numbers have contributed to an increasing per capita GDP and negatively to GDP growth (IMF 2015), the emigration of especially younger and more educated workers may worsen the Baltic states' future growth prospects (Hazans and Philips 2009). As regards the particular sources of growth, as revealed by growth accounting, for the period 1995-2016 there was a modest negative contribution from labour (from -1 per cent of total growth in Estonia to -5 per cent in Lithuania), while 57 per cent in Estonia and 77 per cent in Lithuania came from capital, and growth in total factor productivity accounted for 43 per cent in Estonia and 29 per cent in Lithuania (Levenko et al 2017). The period after the crisis, 2010-16, was characterised by a negligible (even negative) contribution of total factor productivity to growth that coincides with the overall weak growth performance.…”

The productivity growth slowdown in advanced economies: causes and policy recommendations

“…Different productivity levels are significant in explaining why countries having similar amounts of production factors produce different amounts of output [Hall and Jones, 1999]. Total factor productivity (TFP) growth has been identified as the most important source of economic growth during the many decades of US history [Hulten, 2001], as a crucial source of industrial revolution in East Asia [Hsieh, 2002], and as a main or -in some countries -the second most important contributor to economic growth in Central Eastern European economies after the economic transition [Levenko et al, 2018]. Productivity growth is also a determinant of the success on the firm level [Syverson, 2011].…”