2020
DOI: 10.1109/led.2020.2988879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total-Dose Effect of X-ray Irradiation on Low-Temperature Polycrystalline Silicon Thin-Film Transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, a-Si TFTs have been widely used for flat-panel X-ray detectors; however, they suffer from low carrier mobility, thereby necessitating a large TFT with a large parasitic data line capacitance, which increases electronic noise and reduces the pixel fill factor. , The carrier mobility of the LTPS TFT is approximately 100 times higher than that of the a-Si TFTs; therefore, their use increases the pixel fill factor. However, LTPS TFTs exhibited a large degradation of the device performance in terms of threshold voltage ( V TH ) and subthreshold swing ( SS ) even under X-ray irradiation with low total doses of 0.87–4.35 Gy ascribed to the permanent damage to the crystalline structure of LTPS induced by X-ray radiation. Recently, oxide TFTs have attracted considerable attention as backplanes for various flat-panel displays owing to their high carrier mobility, low processing temperature, and high uniformity. Till date, only a few studies have examined the radiation tolerance of n-type oxide TFTs under X-ray irradiation. However, the research results on the effects of X-ray irradiation on p-type oxide TFTs and oxide-TFT-based complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) logic circuits have not yet been reported. CMOS logic circuits using both n-type and p-type transistors exhibit rail-to-rail output voltage swings and high noise margins; , therefore, they can enhance the electrical performance of digital systems compared with n-type logic circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, a-Si TFTs have been widely used for flat-panel X-ray detectors; however, they suffer from low carrier mobility, thereby necessitating a large TFT with a large parasitic data line capacitance, which increases electronic noise and reduces the pixel fill factor. , The carrier mobility of the LTPS TFT is approximately 100 times higher than that of the a-Si TFTs; therefore, their use increases the pixel fill factor. However, LTPS TFTs exhibited a large degradation of the device performance in terms of threshold voltage ( V TH ) and subthreshold swing ( SS ) even under X-ray irradiation with low total doses of 0.87–4.35 Gy ascribed to the permanent damage to the crystalline structure of LTPS induced by X-ray radiation. Recently, oxide TFTs have attracted considerable attention as backplanes for various flat-panel displays owing to their high carrier mobility, low processing temperature, and high uniformity. Till date, only a few studies have examined the radiation tolerance of n-type oxide TFTs under X-ray irradiation. However, the research results on the effects of X-ray irradiation on p-type oxide TFTs and oxide-TFT-based complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) logic circuits have not yet been reported. CMOS logic circuits using both n-type and p-type transistors exhibit rail-to-rail output voltage swings and high noise margins; , therefore, they can enhance the electrical performance of digital systems compared with n-type logic circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we perform the same data processing with the other results, and it reveals that the current of excited behavior exhibits the trend of decrease from cycle to cycle. We believe that the main reason for this situation is based on the length of irradiated time and the accumulated dose [18]. The damage to LTPS TFTs by x-ray irradiation does not linearly accumulate.…”
Section: The Excited Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, their ability to be used as dosimeters of X rays has not been investigated, to our knowledge. X-rays are much more complex and complicated than gamma rays [25] because they are polyenergetic, but the transistor responses are highly dependent on energy from the X-ray spectrum. Many laboratories do not have an X spectrometer but use mean energy and/or a half-value layer as X-beam parameter(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%