2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00356-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization using regularized intermediate density control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Restriction methods for density based topology optimization problems can roughly be divided into three categories: 1) mesh-independent filtering methods, constituting sensitivity filters (Sigmund, 1994(Sigmund, , 1997Sigmund and Petersson, 1998) and density filters (Bruns and Tortorelli, 2001;Bourdin, 2001); 2) constraint methods such as perimeter control (Ambrosio and Buttazzo, 1993;Haber et al, 1994), global gradient control (Bendsøe, 1995;Borrvall, 2001), local gradient control (Niordson, 1983;Petersson and Sigmund, 1998;Zhou et al, 2001), regularized penalty methods (Borrvall and Petersson, 2001) and integral filtering (Poulsen, 2003); and 3) other methods like wavelet parameterizations (Kim and Yoon, 2000;Poulsen, 2002), phase-field approaches (Bourdin and Chambolle, 2003;Wang and Zhou, 2004) and level-set methods (Sethian and Wiegmann, 2000;Wang et al, 2003;Allaire et al, 2004) 1 . The filtering methods in group 1 are probably the most popular ones due to their ease of implementation and their efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restriction methods for density based topology optimization problems can roughly be divided into three categories: 1) mesh-independent filtering methods, constituting sensitivity filters (Sigmund, 1994(Sigmund, , 1997Sigmund and Petersson, 1998) and density filters (Bruns and Tortorelli, 2001;Bourdin, 2001); 2) constraint methods such as perimeter control (Ambrosio and Buttazzo, 1993;Haber et al, 1994), global gradient control (Bendsøe, 1995;Borrvall, 2001), local gradient control (Niordson, 1983;Petersson and Sigmund, 1998;Zhou et al, 2001), regularized penalty methods (Borrvall and Petersson, 2001) and integral filtering (Poulsen, 2003); and 3) other methods like wavelet parameterizations (Kim and Yoon, 2000;Poulsen, 2002), phase-field approaches (Bourdin and Chambolle, 2003;Wang and Zhou, 2004) and level-set methods (Sethian and Wiegmann, 2000;Wang et al, 2003;Allaire et al, 2004) 1 . The filtering methods in group 1 are probably the most popular ones due to their ease of implementation and their efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this case the difficulty for selecting α is transferred to the selection of the constraint value. A variation of the explicit penalization is proposed in [22] where the density ρ in Equation 6 is replaced with a density average which imposes a length scale on the design, however, with the same challenges in selecting α as for the expression given by Equation 6.…”
Section: Interpolation Schemes In Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Table 7, respectively. In the first row of each table the most eroded and the most dilated designs are obtained using the Harmonic mean filter given by Equation 21 and Equation 22, respectively. The filter radius for the Harmonic filter is set to 2.17L/200.…”
Section: Topology Optimization Under Geometrical Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bourdin [2001] proposed a filtering technique by regularizing the density field through the use of a convolution operator to replace the point-wise element densities. Borrvall and Petersson [2001] also implemented a different density filter through regularized density control. Then, Wang and Wang [2005] developed a bilateral filtering technique to perform checkerboard-free, mesh dependent, edge preserving topology optimization.…”
Section: Layout Optimization Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%