Abstract:In order to ensure manufacturability and mesh-independence in density-based topology optimization schemes it is imperative to use restriction methods. This paper introduces a new class of morphology based restriction schemes which work as density filters, i.e. the physical stiffness of an element is based on a function of the design variables of the neighboring elements. The new filters have the advantage that they eliminate grey scale transitions between solid and void regions. Using different test examples, … Show more
“…To achieve a black-and-white solution we extend the filtering with a projection method (Guest et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2010;Sigmund, 2007) in order to introduce a minimum length scale and hence enforce a frame-like solution.…”
Optimal analytical Michell frame structures have been extensively used as benchmark examples in topology optimization, including truss, frame, homogenization, density and level-set based approaches. However, as we will point out, partly the interpretation of Michell's structural continua as discrete frame structures is not accurate and partly, it turns out that limiting structural topology to frame-like structures is a rather severe design restriction and results in structures that are quite far from being stiffness optimal. The paper discusses the interpretation of Michell's theory in the context of numerical topology optimization and compares various topology optimization results obtained with the frame restriction to cases with no design restrictions. For all examples considered, the true stiffness optimal structures are composed of sheets (2D) or closed-walled shell structures (3D) with variable thickness. For optimization problems with one load case, numerical results in two and three dimensions indicate that stiffness can be increased by up to 80% when dropping the frame restriction. For simple loading situations, studies based on optimal microstructures reveal theoretical gains of +200%. It is also demonstrated how too coarse design discretizations in 3D can result in un-
“…To achieve a black-and-white solution we extend the filtering with a projection method (Guest et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2010;Sigmund, 2007) in order to introduce a minimum length scale and hence enforce a frame-like solution.…”
Optimal analytical Michell frame structures have been extensively used as benchmark examples in topology optimization, including truss, frame, homogenization, density and level-set based approaches. However, as we will point out, partly the interpretation of Michell's structural continua as discrete frame structures is not accurate and partly, it turns out that limiting structural topology to frame-like structures is a rather severe design restriction and results in structures that are quite far from being stiffness optimal. The paper discusses the interpretation of Michell's theory in the context of numerical topology optimization and compares various topology optimization results obtained with the frame restriction to cases with no design restrictions. For all examples considered, the true stiffness optimal structures are composed of sheets (2D) or closed-walled shell structures (3D) with variable thickness. For optimization problems with one load case, numerical results in two and three dimensions indicate that stiffness can be increased by up to 80% when dropping the frame restriction. For simple loading situations, studies based on optimal microstructures reveal theoretical gains of +200%. It is also demonstrated how too coarse design discretizations in 3D can result in un-
“…To avoid such incorrect solutions, we use the filtering scheme suggested by Sigmund, discussed in [21]. It essentially means using a weighted averaging of e i (ρ k ) over nearby elements.…”
The connection between apparent density-type bone remodeling theories and density formulations of topology optimization is well known from a large number of publications and its theoretical basis has recently been discussed by making use of a dynamical systems approach to optimization. The present paper takes this connection one step further by showing how the Coleman-Noll procedure of rational thermodynamics can be used to derive general dynamical systems, where a special case includes the lazy zone concept of bone remodeling theory. It is also shown how a numerical solution method for the dynamical system can be developed by using the sequential convex approximation idea. The method is employed to obtain a series of solutions that show the influence of modeling parameters representing elements of plasticity and viscosity in the growth process.
“…Note that while ρ is defined on the potential structural domain only, the variable ξ may be defined on the whole space, see [4]. However, a simplified treatment, discussed, e.g., in [21], is to use a ξ-variable that is defined in the structural domain only and that is what is used in the sequel. The discretized version of the relation between the ξ andρ variables is…”
Section: Restriction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, an averaging of gradients from elements within a radius R of each element needs to be done. An heuristic method which essentially makes only the second of these steps has been suggested by Sigmund, see [21]. In that approach a modification of the gradient is introduced directly without the need for an additional variable ξ.…”
This paper uses a dynamical systems approach for studying the material distribution (density or SIMP) formulation of topology optimization of structures. Such an approach means that an ordinary differential equation, such that the objective function is decreasing along a solution trajectory of this equation, is constructed. For stiffness optimization two differential equations with this property are considered. By simple explicit Euler approximations of these equations, together with projection techniques to satisfy box constraints, we obtain different iteration formulas. One of these formulas turns out to be the classical optimality criteria algorithm, which, thus, is receiving a new interpretation and framework. Based on this finding we suggest extensions of the optimality criteria algorithm.A second important feature of the dynamical systems approach, besides the purely algorithmic one, is that it points at a connection between optimization problems and natural evolution problems such as bone remodeling and damage evolution. This connection has been hinted at previously but, in the opinion of the authors, not been clearly stated since the dynamical systems concept was missing. To give an explicit example of an evolution problem that is in this way connected to an optimization problem, we study a model of bone remodeling.Numerical examples, related to both the algorithmic issue and the issue of natural evolution represented as bone remodeling, are presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.