2014
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2014.2340374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology Optimization for Magnetic Circuits Dedicated to Electric Propulsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the existence and the uniqueness of solution cannot be guaranteed. In general, these design problems could present many local minima (Sanogo et al, 2014;Sanogo and Messine, 2016;Sanogo, 2016). Moreover, for electromagnetic systems, the output responses are very sensitive with respect to small variations of input data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the existence and the uniqueness of solution cannot be guaranteed. In general, these design problems could present many local minima (Sanogo et al, 2014;Sanogo and Messine, 2016;Sanogo, 2016). Moreover, for electromagnetic systems, the output responses are very sensitive with respect to small variations of input data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes homogenization theory method (Murat and Tartar, 1985;Allaire, 2002), topological gradient analysis (Sokołowski and _ Zochowski, 2001), level-set method (Allaire, 2007), material density distribution approach (known as SIMP, solid isotropic material with penalization model: solid isotropic material with penalization of intermediate material densities) (Bendsøe and Sigmund, 2003). Here, we focus on the SIMP model, which is one of the most used methods for numerical structural optimization and was adapted to our framework (Sanogo et al, 2014). In structural optimization, typically in optimal design method based on material distribution concept, challenging problems are in general not well-posed, yielding some numerical stabilities and sensitivities (including convergence problems), and the interpretation of the optimal density distribution solution in terms of available/existent materials is difficult to do in some zones of the design domains (it occurs when the computed solution is non discrete, like it is the case in material layout designs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This method has the particularity of generating topologies with unwanted intermediate materials at the end of the optimisation process. Many authors propose their solutions to this problem, such as in and (Sanogo et al, 2014), amongst others. In this paper, a different way of tackling the problem is presented to eliminate these intermediate materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%