2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11401-007-0316-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological representations of distributive hypercontinuous lattices

Abstract: The concept of locally strong compactness on domains is generalized to general topological spaces. It is proved that for each distributive hypercontinuous lattice L, the space SpecL of nonunit prime elements endowed with the hull-kernel topology is locally strongly compact, and for each locally strongly compact space X, the complete lattice of all open sets O(X) is distributive hypercontinuous. For the case of distributive hyperalgebraic lattices, the similar result is given. For a sober space X, it is shown t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since x ≺ y in L if and only if there exists a finite subset F ⊆ L such that y ∈ ↓F and L \ ↓F ⊆ ↑x, one can easily get the following intrinsic characterization of hypercontinuous lattices (see, e.g., [4,7,8]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since x ≺ y in L if and only if there exists a finite subset F ⊆ L such that y ∈ ↓F and L \ ↓F ⊆ ↑x, one can easily get the following intrinsic characterization of hypercontinuous lattices (see, e.g., [4,7,8]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) ⇒ (2) : Since L is GCD iff L op is hypercontinuous by Theorem 2.5, (2) follows directly from Theorem 2.1 of [8].…”
Section: Lemma 24 a Complete Lattice L Is A Gcd Lattice If And Onlymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Definition 3.4 (see [6]) Let ρ be a binary relation on a set X. Define a binary relation ρ (<ω) on X (<ω) , called the finite extension of ρ, by…”
Section: Example 33 Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further criteria for regularity were given by Markowsky [19] and Schein [20] (see also [21] and [22]). Motivated by the fundamental works relative Zareckiǐ on regular relations, Xu and Liu [23] introduced the concepts of nitely regular relations and generalized nitely regular relations, respectively. It is proved that a relation ρ is generalized nitely regular if and only if the interval topology on (Φρ(X), ⊆) is T .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we introduce the concepts of the split T interval topology on posets and weak generalized nitely regular relations. Meanwhile, in order to characterize split T interval topology of posets by a order structure, like the equivalence of the T interval topology and quasi-hypercontinuous lattices in [23], we give the notion of a weak quasi-hypercontinuous poset. It is proved that when a binary relation ρ : X Y satis es property M, ρ is weak generalized nitely regular if and only if (φρ(X, Y), ⊆) is a weak quasihypercontinuous poset if and only if the interval topology on (φρ(X, Y), ⊆) is split T , where φρ(X, Y) = {ρ(x) : x ∈ X}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%