1988
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902690307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographical organization of cortical afferents to extrastriate visual area PO in the macaque: A dual tracer study

Abstract: We have examined the origin and topography of cortical projections to area PO, an extrastriate visual area located in the parieto-occipital sulcus of the macaque. Distinguishable retrograde fluorescent tracers were injected into area PO at separate retinotopic loci identified by single-neuron recording. The results indicate that area PO receives retinotopically organized inputs from visual areas V1, V2, V3, V4, and MT. In each of these areas the projection to PO arises from the representation of the periphery … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

49
458
5
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
49
458
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These and other findings (for review, see (27)) suggest that visuomotor systems may be more sensitive to stimuli in the visual periphery than the perceptual systems mediating our experience of the visual world beyond the fovea. These behavioural observations in humans are consistent with anatomical and electrophysiological studies in the monkey showing that areas in the dorsal stream receive extensive inputs from the peripheral visual fields while inputs to the ventral stream are largely from more central regions of the visual field (for review, see (2,12)). The difference in representation of the visual field might explain why the visual control of grasping movements directed at targets in the visual periphery is so much more reliable than perceptual judgements about those same objects; in short, the dorsal action is simply better connected with the visual periphery than the ventral perception system.…”
Section: Perception and Visuomotor Control In The Peripherysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These and other findings (for review, see (27)) suggest that visuomotor systems may be more sensitive to stimuli in the visual periphery than the perceptual systems mediating our experience of the visual world beyond the fovea. These behavioural observations in humans are consistent with anatomical and electrophysiological studies in the monkey showing that areas in the dorsal stream receive extensive inputs from the peripheral visual fields while inputs to the ventral stream are largely from more central regions of the visual field (for review, see (2,12)). The difference in representation of the visual field might explain why the visual control of grasping movements directed at targets in the visual periphery is so much more reliable than perceptual judgements about those same objects; in short, the dorsal action is simply better connected with the visual periphery than the ventral perception system.…”
Section: Perception and Visuomotor Control In The Peripherysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, peripheral but not central representations of areas V1 and V2 are connected with numerous dorsal visual stream areas in temporal and parietal cortex (Colby et al 1988;Gattass et al 1990;Nakamura et al 1993;Gattass et al 1997;Ungerleider et al 2008). Area prostriata is reported to have visual function (Sousa et al 1991;Rosa et al 1997) and appears to preferentially connect with the peripheral representation of areas V1, V2, and MT (Palmer and Rosa 2006).…”
Section: Visual Field Eccentricity and Multimodal Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the idea of gain modulation for space-context integration holds true, then spatially selective neurons in primate cortical sensorimotor areas, like the parietal reach region (PRR) and the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), should be upregulated and downregulated by the behavioral context. Spatial sensory information presumably reaches the frontoparietal sensorimotor network via the posterior parietal cortex (Colby et al, 1988;Blatt et al, 1990;Marconi et al, 2001). Associative goal selection criteria or arbitrary transformation rules are believed to exert their influence on motor planning via prefrontal and premotor areas (Rushworth et al, 1997;Wise and Murray, 2000;Toni et al, 2001;Wallis and Miller, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%