Top Team Deterioration as Part of the Downward Spiral of Large Corporate Bankruptcies

Abstract

This exploratory study of 57 large bankruptcies and 57 matched survivors examined the top management team (TMT) characteristics associated with major corporate failure. Prior research was used to guide selection of specific team characteristics for study. Not only did the failing firms show significant annual, or cross-sectional, divergence from survivors on several indicators of TMT composition, but also those divergences became more pronounced, even accelerating, over the last five years of the bankrupts' lives. The results thus suggest that deterioration of the top management team is a central element of the downward spiral of large corporate failures. Based upon a limited test of causality, the authors propose that a two-way process is at work: (1) team deficiencies bring about or aggravate corporate deterioration, either through strategic errors or stakeholder uneasiness with the flawed team; and (2) corporate deterioration brings about team deterioration, through a combination of voluntary departures, scapegoating, and limited resources for attracting new executive talent.top management teams, executive leadership, organizational decline, bankruptcy

A Good Reputation: Protection against Shareholder Activism

“…Their research shows that past research has extensively investigated reputational issues affecting the reaction of financial markets to extraordinary events (e.g., D' Aveni and Kesner, 1993;Hambrick and D' Aveni, 1992;Schnietz and Epstein, 2005). Our research like-wise points to the role of reputation in special situations, and the applicability of qualitative corporate factors in capital markets.…”

An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities

“…Recent meta-analysis has found that the relationship between firm performance and board size is stronger for smaller, as compared to larger firms (Dalton et al 1999). Filatotchev and Toms (2003) and Hambrick and D'Aveni (1992) argue similarly that board diversity and director interlocks may play an important role in crisis situations, since, from a resourcedependency view, these board structures may generate more diverse networking opportunities to resource providers. Research on IPOs (Certo et al 2001;Filatotchev and Bishop 2002;Sanders and Boivie 2004) also demonstrates that board diversity supports wealth-creating aspects of corporate governance in newly listed companies.…”

Organizational Decline Research Review: Challenges and Issues for a Future Research Agenda

“…This factor is also composed of prescriptive works such as contingency theory for turnaround (Hofer, 1980), hierarchy of change and structural growth (Katz & Kahn, 1966) and a chapter on competitive strategy in declining industries from Michael Porter's book (Porter, 1980). The first factor of the second period, covering 1991 to 2002, was TMT in organizational decline, made up of studies on the TMT in decline situations (Altman & Hotchkiss, 1983;Gilson, 1989) and especially in the case of bankruptcy, such as studies on TMT as a scapegoat (Boeker, 1992;, the deterioration of the TMT (Hambrick & D'Aveni, 1992;Moulton & Thomas, 1993), and the stigma of TMT (Sutton & Callahan, 1987). This factor also included studies on decision making in situations of risk (Singh, 1986), threat-rigidity effects (Staw et al, 1981) and the aforementioned resource dependence theory (Pfeffer & Salancick, 1978).…”

“…The second factor, decline process includes the works that address the characteristics inherent to decline (D'Aveni 1989b; Hambrick & D'Aveni, 1988) and adaptation, decision making and TMT (Hambrick & D'Aveni, 1992;Meyer, 1982;Singh, 1986;Staw et al, 1981). The third factor is also called mortality.…”