2011
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-52862011000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top Incomes in Chile using 50 years of household surveys: 1957-2007

Abstract: Using household surveys that cover more than 50 years of the political and economic history of Chile, we

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that using households as the unit of analysis would result in lower top income shares, considering that female labor participation is relatively low in Chile. Sanhueza and Mayer () illustrate this phenomenon for the top decile and top centile using household survey data; however, they find that differences between shares constructed using household income, per capita household income, and individual income are small. Analyzing gender inequality with tax return data is an interesting potential avenue for future research if the tax agency is able to supply such information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that using households as the unit of analysis would result in lower top income shares, considering that female labor participation is relatively low in Chile. Sanhueza and Mayer () illustrate this phenomenon for the top decile and top centile using household survey data; however, they find that differences between shares constructed using household income, per capita household income, and individual income are small. Analyzing gender inequality with tax return data is an interesting potential avenue for future research if the tax agency is able to supply such information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative movements from lower positions in the distribution to the top are modest in Chile (Sanhueza and Mayer, 2011), Canada (Saez and Veall, 2005) and the USA (Kopczuk et al, 2010), except for women, who experienced a relevant upward mobility from the 1980s on. On the other hand, absolute mobility within the top, that is, from a high to an even higher level, seems to be reasonably common and an important factor behind the rise in inequality in many countries in North America and Europe.…”
Section: Determinants Of Affluencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consequently, and despite that Chile has made progress in overcoming poverty over the rest of Latin America, 10 % of the richest population receives 47 % of income, while the poorest 20 % only 3.4 % (Sanhueza and Mayer 2011). Income inequality contradicts the principle of equitable distribution in production of biofuels, and would not produce a fair distribution of profits (Buyx and Tait 2011).…”
Section: Principle 5 Equitable Distributionmentioning
confidence: 97%