Tools for evaluation of restriction on auditory participation: systematic review of the literature

Souza, Valquíria Conceição; Lemos, Stela Maris Aguiar

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20152015008

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Such evaluation offers support in the choosing of the proper technology, the selecting and adjusting of electroacoustic characteristics, algorithms and resources needed in each case, and helps to measure the effectiveness of the intervention, i.e. the analysis of the results (3,6) and the need for new approaches. Amongst the tools used to check participation restrictions imposed by hearing impairment (auditory needs) is the HHIE; as for those used to evaluate the cognitive decline (non-auditory needs) the MMSE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Restrições de participação e estado mental: estudo em novos usuários de próteses auditivas

Luz

Ghiringhelli

Iório

2018

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Introdução: A deficiência auditiva pode exacerbar mudanças cognitivas decorrentes do envelhecimento. Objetivo: Estudar a restrição de participação em atividades diárias e processos cognitivos em idosos, novos usuários de próteses auditivas. Métodos: Foram avaliados 50 idosos com perda auditiva neurossensorial de grau leve a moderadamente severo, novos usuários de amplificação sonora, distribuídos em três grupos, segundo o grau da perda auditiva. Foram aplicados o Hearing Handicap Inventory For Elderly e o Mini Exame do Estado Mental, antes e após 12 a 16 semanas de uso das próteses auditivas. O tratamento estatístico foi realizado por meio da análise de variância e comparações múltiplas de Bonferroni, com nível de significância de 0,05. Resultados: Após a estimulação acústica por meio do uso de próteses auditivas por 12 a 16 semanas, houve redução da restrição de participação em atividades diárias, tanto na subescala emocional, quanto na social/situacional do Hearing Handicap Inventory For Elderly. Idosos com perda de grau moderadamente severo apresentaram maiores restrições de participação na subescala social e no escore total do Hearing Handicap Inventory For Elderly. O Mini Exame do Estado Mental revelou maiores escores total e dos domínios orientação, memória imediata, atenção e cálculo, evocação e linguagem, após o uso das próteses auditivas. Quanto ao gênero, idosos do gênero feminino apresentaram média dos escores menores em atenção e cálculo. Conclusão: Os idosos com deficiência auditiva apresentaram redução da autopercepção das restrições de participação e melhora dos processos cognitivos de orientação, memória imediata, atenção e cálculo, evocação e linguagem, com a estimulação acústica.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hearing evaluations are not able to detect social, situational and communicative restrictions and limitations caused by hearing loss (3) , so the application of self-assessment questionnaires is recommended (4,5,6) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restrições de participação e estado mental: estudo em novos usuários de próteses auditivas

Luz

Ghiringhelli

Iório

2018

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…세계보건기구(World Health Organization, WHO)에서는 청각 장애를 신체적인 결함, 즉 청력 손실의 문제로만 한정하지 않고, 청 력 손실로 인한 사회 참여 제한, 정서적인 좌절감 등으로 개인이 겪 는 다양한 듣기의 어려움으로 규정하였다 (WHO, 1980(WHO, , 2001 (Chang, Ho, & Chou, 2009 난청 노인의 주관적 청각장애지수에 관한 선행 연구 (Chang et al, 2009;Hong & Lee, 2002;Weinstein & Ventry, 1983) (Hong & Lee, 2002;Souza & Lemos, 2015;Weinstein & Ventry, 1983). (Hong & Lee, 2002;Souza & Lemos, 2015;Weinstein & Ventry, 1983)에서 제시 (Kang, 2006); K-COWAT = Korean version of Controlled Oral Word Association Test ; K-TMT-E = Korean version of Trail Making Test for elderly (Lee, 2006); K-CWST = Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test ; SGDS = Short form of Geriatric Depression Scale, Korean version (Cho et al, 1999 (Choi & Chung, 2011;Ferrai et al, 2019;Kim & Yeo, 2015…”

unclassified

Exploring Factors Related to Self-perceived Hearing Handicap in the Elderly with Moderate to Moderately-severe Hearing Loss

Lee

Park²,

Lee

2020

Commun Sci Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The aims of this study were to compare the performance related to audiometric, cognitive function, and depression variables between the elderly with mild-to-moderate hearing handicap and the elderly with severe hearing handicap, to identify which factors are correlated with their self-perceived hearing handicap, and to determine which factors can distinguish the elderly with mild-to-moderate hearing handicap from the elderly with severe hearing handicap. Methods: A total of 22 elderly patients with moderate to moderately-severe hearing loss participated in this study. The Korean version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (K-HHIE) was administered to obtain their hearing handicap scores. All patients underwent audiometric, cognitive function, and depression assessments. Results: We found a significant differences in the average hearing threshold, sentence recognition scores in noise, and depression scores between the two groups. The scores of the K-HHIE significantly correlated with the average hearing threshold, sentence recognition scores in noise, and depression scores in all elderly patients with hearing loss. In the logistic regression analysis, sentence recognition scores of +5 dB SNR were a significant factor for differentiating between the two groups. Conclusion: The hearing threshold, speech perception in noise, and depression level are significantly associated with self-perceived hearing handicap in the elderly with moderate to moderately-severe hearing loss. These results indicate that audiometric and depression assessments are need to provide appropriate auditory-habilitation services for cognitively normal elderly with moderate to moderately-severe hearing loss.

show abstract

“…Hearing loss was assessed by a series of 11 standardised questions, 10 of which were derived from the ‘Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening Version (HHIE-S)’ (box 1). 17–19 The questions could be answered by ‘no’ (0 point), ‘sometimes’ (2 points) and ‘yes’ (4 points). The total hearing loss score was the sum of all points and could range between 0 and 44 points.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The amount of hearing loss was assessed by the hearing loss score. The HHIE-S had been applied in previous investigations 17–19. The diagnostic performance of the HHIE-S against five definitions of hearing loss as assessed by pure-tone audiometry had been investigated in a previous study on 178 elderly subjects 20.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-reported hearing loss in Russians: the population-based Ural Eye and Medical Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveWith data on frequency of hearing loss in Russia and Eastern Europe generally lacking, we assessed the prevalence of hearing loss in a Russian population.SettingThe population-based Ural Eye and Medical Study was conducted in the rural and urban regions of Bashkortostan, Russia.ParticipantsWith an inclusion criterion of age 40+ years, the study included 5899 (80.5%) out of 7328 eligible individuals (mean age: 59.0±10.7 years; range: 40–94 years).Primary and secondary outcome measuresHearing loss was examined in 5397 (91.5%) study participants, assessed using a standardised interview with questions from the ‘Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening Version (HHIE-S)’.ResultsThe prevalence of self-reported hearing loss (26.1%, 95% CI 24.2 to 27.2) increased from 10.9% (95% CI 8.0 to 13.7) in participants aged 40–45 years old to 59.0% (95% CI 51.6 to 66.4) in those aged 80+ years old. It was higher for men than for women in the 60–80 years age group (38.93%, 95% CI 35.8 to 42.1, vs 32.8%, 95% CI 30.2 to 35.3; p=0.003). On multivariable analysis, higher prevalence of hearing loss was associated with older age (p<0.001; OR [per year of age]: 1.06 [1.06 to 1.07]), male gender (p<0.001; OR: 1.26 [1.09 to 1.47]), higher depression score (p<0.001; OR: 1.06 [1.04 to 1.08]), higher prevalence of headache (p=0.001; OR: 1.27 [1.10 to 1.47]), history of cardiovascular diseases including stroke (p=0.001; OR: 1.32 [1.13 to 1.55]), and osteoarthritis (p<0.001; OR: 1.40 [1.18 to 1.67]), physically vigorous activity during work (p<0.001; OR: 1.40 [1.21 to 1.62]), alcohol consumption (p<0.001; OR: 1.51 [1.28 to 1.78]), and dry eye feeling (p<0.001; OR: 1.67 [1.30 to 2.16]). It was marginally correlated with a higher anxiety score (p=0.07; OR: 1.03 [0.998 to 1.06]). It was independent of diabetes (p=0.52), arterial hypertension (p=0.20), level of education (p=0.11), region of habitation (p=0.70), blood concentration of high-density lipoproteins (p=0.17) and low-density lipoproteins (p=0.52), current smoking (p=0.95) and smoking pack-years (p=0.37), and best corrected visual acuity (p=0.93).ConclusionsAs in other countries the prevalence of hearing loss is high in this elderly population in Russia. It is primarily or secondarily associated with older age, depression, male gender, cardiovascular disease and alcohol consumption.

show abstract

Tools for evaluation of restriction on auditory participation: systematic review of the literature

Cited by 14 publications

References 23 publications

Restrições de participação e estado mental: estudo em novos usuários de próteses auditivas

Restrições de participação e estado mental: estudo em novos usuários de próteses auditivas

Exploring Factors Related to Self-perceived Hearing Handicap in the Elderly with Moderate to Moderately-severe Hearing Loss

Self-reported hearing loss in Russians: the population-based Ural Eye and Medical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About