The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology 2007
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511486371.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This practice is based on previous evidence that the entire syllable is the tone-bearing unit Wong and Xu, 2007;Xu, 1998). However, because there is no F 0 during a voiceless consonant, it is also reasonable to assume that voiceless intervals are irrelevant for realizing underlying tonal contours, as has been argued based on phonetic data (Howie, 1974;Rose, 1988), and assumed in some phonological accounts of tone (Duanmu, 2000;Yip, 2002;Zhang, 2004). More frequently, the issue of the exact temporal interval of tonal unit is left vague.…”
Section: Case Study B: Target Bearing Unit -Rhyme Vs Syllablementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This practice is based on previous evidence that the entire syllable is the tone-bearing unit Wong and Xu, 2007;Xu, 1998). However, because there is no F 0 during a voiceless consonant, it is also reasonable to assume that voiceless intervals are irrelevant for realizing underlying tonal contours, as has been argued based on phonetic data (Howie, 1974;Rose, 1988), and assumed in some phonological accounts of tone (Duanmu, 2000;Yip, 2002;Zhang, 2004). More frequently, the issue of the exact temporal interval of tonal unit is left vague.…”
Section: Case Study B: Target Bearing Unit -Rhyme Vs Syllablementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tone languages exploit variations in pitch at the syllable level to signal differences in word meaning (Yip 2003). The bulk of information on tonal processing in the brain comes primarily from two tone languages: Mandarin Chinese, which has four contrastive tones, and Thai, which has five (for reviews, see Gandour (1998Gandour ( , 2006a).…”
Section: Evidence For An Interaction Between Processing Of Pitch Infomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sets the account apart from the original proposal of Gradient Symbolic Representations in Smolensky & Goldrick (2016);Rosen (2016). Apart from this new representational assumptions of gradient acitvity, the analysis is based primarily on standard constraints on tone structures (cf., for example, Yip, 2002) -the assumption of Gradient Symbolic Representations hence allows to predict a wide variety of apparent exceptionality patterns from a single and rather simple phonology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%