2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.022120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomography of a spin qubit in a double quantum dot

Abstract: We investigate a range of methods to perform tomography in a solid-state qubit device, for which a priori initialization and measurement of the qubit is restricted to a single basis of the Bloch sphere. We explore and compare several methods to acquire precise descriptions of additional states and measurements, quantifying both stochastic and systematic errors, ultimately leading to a tomographically-complete set that can be subsequently used in process tomography. We focus in detail on the example of a spin q… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(a)], choosing the drive amplitude that maximizes the echo coherence time. Self-consistent two-qubit measurement and state tomography [30] (see Supplementary Information) reveal an oscillating concurrence [31] of the two-qubit state [ Fig. 3(c)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a)], choosing the drive amplitude that maximizes the echo coherence time. Self-consistent two-qubit measurement and state tomography [30] (see Supplementary Information) reveal an oscillating concurrence [31] of the two-qubit state [ Fig. 3(c)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually the process of reconstructing an unknown quantum state by measurement is called quantum state tomography (QST) [1]. In the last several decades, different QST schemes have been presented including standard QST [2,3], QST by means of a single apparatus [4][5][6][7], QST on symmetric informationally complete positive-operator valued measure [8][9][10][11][12], QST on mutually unbiased bases [13][14][15], QST via unambiguous state discrimination [16], direct QST via weak measurement [17,18], QST via compressed sensing [19,20], and self-calibrating tomography [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of systematic measurement errors, for example [39], can comprise the security of quantum key distribution protocols [40]. Schemes which guard against measurement errors go by the name self-consistent tomography [41][42][43][44][45][46]. A recently investigated alternative is the application of classical approaches to model selection, which have been used in a variety of experimental [51,52] and theoretical [47][48][49][50] works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%