2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.032103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining ann-qubit state by a single apparatus through a pairwise interaction

Abstract: This paper shows how one can reconstruct an unknown n-qubit state by only a single apparatus. Its core is a redistribution of the information within an extended Hilbert space by coupling the unknown system with an assistant system through only a pairwise interaction, which results in a one-to-one mapping between the unknown density matrix elements and the probabilities of the occurrence of the eigenvalues of a single, factorized observable of the composite system. In such an interaction configuration, which is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating the quantum state of a quantum computer is an essential task to evaluate the performance of quantum algorithms [11], [12]. A d-dimensional quantum state is identified by a density operator, characterized by d 2 − 1 real parameters, which are estimated using quantum state tomography methods [13], [14] such as standard state tomography [12], using universal single observables [15]- [17], machine learning techniques [18], [19], or more recent classical shadow methods [20], [21]. This process is described using a measurement model [22], characterized by a set of positive operator-valued measurement (POVM) elements, which are operators that describe the statistics of the measurement process.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimating the quantum state of a quantum computer is an essential task to evaluate the performance of quantum algorithms [11], [12]. A d-dimensional quantum state is identified by a density operator, characterized by d 2 − 1 real parameters, which are estimated using quantum state tomography methods [13], [14] such as standard state tomography [12], using universal single observables [15]- [17], machine learning techniques [18], [19], or more recent classical shadow methods [20], [21]. This process is described using a measurement model [22], characterized by a set of positive operator-valued measurement (POVM) elements, which are operators that describe the statistics of the measurement process.…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the estimation error for different initial states, in Fig. 3, we graphed the Fisher error (17) as a function of α 1 and α 2 . The parameters Θ 1 and Θ 2 where randomly chosen while Θ * represents the optimal parameters.…”
Section: A Parameterized Quantum Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unknown quantum state can not be perfectly cloned and determined by measuring only one quantum system [1]. In quantum information theory, quantum state tomography (QST) which is used to reconstruct the unknown state by measuring the identical quantum systems is an important topic [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In the conventional QST, it requires the measurements of a complete set of noncommutative observables, which are difficult to be realized perfectly in actual experiments, especially for highdimensional systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the quantum no-clone theorem prohibits the perfect estimation of the unknown state of a single quantum system [1,2], state reconstruction is possible via repeatedly measuring an ensemble of identical systems, a process usually called quantum state tomography (QST). Besides the standard QST strategies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], a novel tomography strategy, conventionally called direct state tomography (DST), or weak-value tomography, has been widely investigated both theoretically and experimentally [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%