2003
DOI: 10.1051/agro:2002088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomato yield and quality as affected by nitrogen source and salinity

Abstract: -Tomato plants cv. Daniela were grown in a nutrient solution containing 0, 30 and 60 mM NaCl and fertilized with 14/0, 12/2 and 10/4 NO 3 -/NH 4 + mM ratio to determine the effect of salinity and nitrogen source. Salinity in general reduced the total tomato fruit yield regardless of nitrogen source. However, no yield reduction was observed for nitrate-fed plants in the presence of 30 mM NaCl. Increasing NH 4 + concentration in the nutrient solutions decreased tomato yield. The highest yield was found in the fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From our experiment, it is obvious that the variety 'Rio grande' is better adapted to the local conditions, since its yield was two times greater than that of the variety 'Rossol VFN'. Globally, fruit mineral composition was similar to that mentioned in other papers [15][16][17] and did not show major mineral deficiencies. However, taking into account potassium, calcium and to a degree phosphorus fruit concentrations, fertilization treatments can be separated into two groups: the group of low fruit mineral concentration (with the F0 and F4 treatments) and the group of high fruit mineral concentration (with the F1, F2 and F3 treatments).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…From our experiment, it is obvious that the variety 'Rio grande' is better adapted to the local conditions, since its yield was two times greater than that of the variety 'Rossol VFN'. Globally, fruit mineral composition was similar to that mentioned in other papers [15][16][17] and did not show major mineral deficiencies. However, taking into account potassium, calcium and to a degree phosphorus fruit concentrations, fertilization treatments can be separated into two groups: the group of low fruit mineral concentration (with the F0 and F4 treatments) and the group of high fruit mineral concentration (with the F1, F2 and F3 treatments).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, these characteristics can be influenced by nitrogen fertilization (ARMENTA -BOJORQUEZ et al, 2001;OBERLY et al, 2002;FLORES et al, 2003;VALENCIA et al, 2003;WARNER et al, 2004) that might have been in excess or lacking in the organic fertilizer used in the present study. Ferreira et al (2006) studied tomato quality in relation to nitrogen and organic fertilizer application rates in two seasons and found that tomato fruit pH was not changed by higher N rates, reaching average pH of 4.58 and 4.61 with and without adding organic matter to the soil, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In this case, the total nitrogen concentration was not affected. Other studies on tomato and salinity showed that fruit Ca 2+ was also decreased by salinity or NH + 4 , with the negative effect of NH + 4 being higher than the effect of salinity (Flores et al, 2003).…”
Section: Salinitymentioning
confidence: 85%