2015
DOI: 10.1101/022079
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomato I2 immune receptor can be engineered to confer partial resistance to the oomycetePhytophthora infestansin addition to the fungusFusarium oxysporum

Abstract: Plants and animals rely on immune receptors, known as nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat containing proteins (NB-LRR or NLR), to defend against invading pathogens and activate immune responses. How NLR receptors respond to pathogens is inadequately understood. We previously reported single-residue mutations that expand the response of the potato immune receptor R3a to AVR3a EM , a stealthy effector from the late blight oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans. I2, another NLR that mediates resis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, R3a and I2, which are located at a complex R gene locus in a colinear region on chromosome 11 in potato and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), confer resistance to the oomycete Phytophthora infestans and the soil-borne fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum, respectively (Huang et al, 2005). Interestingly, I2 also is able to show a weak recognition response to the cognate R3a elicitor Avr3a, which could be enhanced by a single mutation in the CC domain and even result in partial late blight resistance (Segretin et al, 2014;Giannakopoulou et al, 2015). Apparently, the R3a and I2 recognition specificity has evolved over time by sequence diversification, which enables the detection of different pathogen species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, R3a and I2, which are located at a complex R gene locus in a colinear region on chromosome 11 in potato and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), confer resistance to the oomycete Phytophthora infestans and the soil-borne fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum, respectively (Huang et al, 2005). Interestingly, I2 also is able to show a weak recognition response to the cognate R3a elicitor Avr3a, which could be enhanced by a single mutation in the CC domain and even result in partial late blight resistance (Segretin et al, 2014;Giannakopoulou et al, 2015). Apparently, the R3a and I2 recognition specificity has evolved over time by sequence diversification, which enables the detection of different pathogen species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, site-directed and random mutagenesis approaches have been used to expand the recognition spectra of the NLRs Rx and R3a (Harris et al, 2013;Segretin et al, 2014;Giannakopoulou et al, 2015) against their respective cognate effectors, generating both allele-specific and 'trigger-happy', sensitized mutant variants of each NLR. Expansion of RPP1 specificity may have similarly occurred in various homologs, but through a combination of repeat expansion and sequence variation.…”
Section: New Phytologistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term is often used as a synonym for QDR, but it is important to note that there are several examples of strain-specific quantitative resistance loci (QRLs) (Poland et al, 2009). On the other hand, PRRs can confer a broad spectrum defense (Zipfel, 2014) and single R genes can also mediate broad-spectrum resistance (Xiao et al, 2001;Zhao et al, 2004;Narusaka et al, 2009) or can be engineered to achieve this type of resistance (Segretin et al, 2014;Giannakopoulou et al, 2015).…”
Section: Quantitative Resistance Enters Into the Gamementioning
confidence: 99%