2014
DOI: 10.1038/nphys3110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Together we stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Shibayama et al (2015) find significant variation in division of labor across life science research labs. One counter force limiting the division of labor is the training function that university research groups perform (for graduate students and post-docs), which may put limits on division of labor (Delamont and Atkinson, 2001;Hackett, 1990;Pavlidis et al, 2014). These findings and arguments suggest that division of labor is not a necessary condition of team research (and hence it is an open question as to what drives this variation in division of labor).…”
Section: Sizementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Shibayama et al (2015) find significant variation in division of labor across life science research labs. One counter force limiting the division of labor is the training function that university research groups perform (for graduate students and post-docs), which may put limits on division of labor (Delamont and Atkinson, 2001;Hackett, 1990;Pavlidis et al, 2014). These findings and arguments suggest that division of labor is not a necessary condition of team research (and hence it is an open question as to what drives this variation in division of labor).…”
Section: Sizementioning
confidence: 85%
“…While this trend began decades ago (Price, 1963;Swatez, 1966), the sizes of contemporary research teams in many fields are beginning to approach that of medium-sized firms (Biagioli, 2003;Birnholtz, 2006;Milojević, 2014;Pavlidis et al, 2014;Salonius, 2008). Rather than a focus on an individual's lab bench, scientific work increasingly takes place in a setting that more closely resembles a small "factory" or "quasi-firm", run by a "small businessperson" lab director (Etzkowitz, 1983;Hackett, 1990;Latour and Woolgar, 1979;Shrum et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…pdf), and a recent panel discussion at The University of Michigan (http://www.michr.umich.edu/education/ teamscience/print). Some of the challenges that traditional academic cultures must surmount to benefit from team science are thoughtfully discussed in a recent commentary [9].…”
Section: Professions That Need Immunologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, due to interdependencies in a team science network, conflict of interest and the balancing of collaboration versus competition becomes a riddle, with consequences for the peer-review process. The analysis of all these team science issues informs a discussion about ethical norms of behavior to resolve them Pavlidis et al 2014).…”
Section: Authorship and Peer-reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%