Purpose:The purpose of this analysis from our Spheres of Ethics Teaching Using Film (SOETUF) study was to assess whether college students, in approaching new information on bioethics presented using either a film or a written text, anticipated that one medium (film vs. text) would be more effective for addressing certain issues or would have different impacts on their emotions.
Methods:This aspect of the SOETUF study consisted of 48 college student who volunteered to take the SOETUF Sans-Trigger (S-T) Questionnaire. The SOETUF S-T Questionnaire, which was developed for this study, consisted of two Domains-Of-Interest: 1) the 11-item 'Anticipated Types of Situation Domain-of-Interest (ATOS-DOI); and, 2) the 23item 'Anticipated Emotions Domain-of-Interest'(AE-DOI).
Results:The results for the ATOS-DOI revealed the students anticipated that text would be a more effective medium regarding thought provoking situations and would be more likely to create a cool analytical thinking situation and to create a lasting impact on them while they thought that film would be the superior medium for portraying violence, humour and hot empathy. For the AE-DOI, the students reported anticipating that film would be much better for evoking the emotions of terrified, frightened, anger, scared, disturbed, threatened, fearful and uncomfortable, as well as for feeling energetic.
Conclusion:The SOETUF S-T Questionnaire successfully discerned meaningful differences in college students' anticipated reaction to the use of a film trigger versus a text trigger in the teaching of bioethics.