2001
DOI: 10.1108/eum0000000006275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco taxes and government revenue in South Africa

Abstract: The South African government's objectives relating to tobacco, primarily deterrence and revenue generation, have since the early 1970s not been maintained. The real value of tobacco taxes fell over the 20-year period 1970 to 1990 and, as a result, consumption steadily increased. Since 1990, however, the government has, despite vociferous opposition from the industry, embarked on a stronger programme of tobacco control and has increased excise taxes in real terms. Uses a simulation model of the government's non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the booming economy has boosted disposable income, while health awareness appears to have hit a plateau – offsetting the negative effect of real price increases. Therefore, a narrow policy aimed at repeatedly exploiting the price elasticity of smokers may be misguided if it ignores other factors that also contribute to the evolution of cigarette consumption (see pro‐excise tax arguments by Abedian and Jacobs (2001)). It is mistaken to argue that a 10% increase in cigarette prices today will reduce consumption by an amount similar to the reduction achieved by a hypothetical 10% increase in the 1990s, as preferences and economic conditions are quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, the booming economy has boosted disposable income, while health awareness appears to have hit a plateau – offsetting the negative effect of real price increases. Therefore, a narrow policy aimed at repeatedly exploiting the price elasticity of smokers may be misguided if it ignores other factors that also contribute to the evolution of cigarette consumption (see pro‐excise tax arguments by Abedian and Jacobs (2001)). It is mistaken to argue that a 10% increase in cigarette prices today will reduce consumption by an amount similar to the reduction achieved by a hypothetical 10% increase in the 1990s, as preferences and economic conditions are quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaloupka et al. (2000) and Abedian and Jacobs (2001) provide summaries of current international research on the demand for tobacco, distinguishing between estimates for developed and developing economies. These authors find that estimates of the price elasticity of tobacco demand in developing countries are generally higher than those in developed nations (Chaloupka et al.…”
Section: Previous Research On Price Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On governance resource type, after the analysis of the results, it was shown that out of the 17 studies included in the quality synthesis about 64.70% (N=11) policies reported were based on regulation, 10 , 32 , 33 , 50–55 29.41% (N=5) dwelt on the economic nature 29 , 30 , 56–59 and lastly 1 report was based on Informative side and constituted 5.88% (N=1) percentage 56 (see Table 2 and Figure 2 ). The results in Table 3 show a general overview of the main characteristics of the 17 studies that were included in the quality synthesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,25 These studies have tackled almost all tobacco control policies. However, the majority of them tended to concentrate on economic policies like taxation [29][30][31] and regulatory-like smoke-free environment. [32][33][34] The vast majority of literature indicates that the application of such policies and research findings has been facing some difficulties in many setups due to the social economic benefits that are inherently attached to the tobacco industry and the involvement of politicians in the industry who are also in policymakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1999 Tobacco Products Control Act (TPCA) amended the 1993 TPCA by prohibiting the advertisement and promotion of tobacco products, the free distribution of tobacco products and the receipt of gift or cash prices in contests, lotteries or games to the buyer of tobacco products. The existence of these policies sparked research on the economics of tobacco in South Africa, with particular focus on price sensitivity (Van Walbeek, ; Abedian and Jacobs, ).…”
Section: The Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%