2017
DOI: 10.1080/19404158.2017.1398766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To what extent does children’s spelling improve as a result of learning words with the look, say, cover, write, check, fix strategy compared with phonological spelling strategies?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher the number and complexity of rules, the number of exceptions, and sources of inconsistency of an orthography, the more difficult it is to impart this knowledge and to use it for the remediation of spelling deficits (Caravolas, 2005). For very complex orthographies like English, it has been argued that interventions concentrating on memorization strategies of whole-word letter sequences are more efficient than interventions focusing on the teaching complex rules and regularities (Dymock & Nicholson, 2017;Hilte & Reitsma, 2011). This implies that the interventional aspects will vary not only in their importance for a given orthographic system , but also in their applicability for spelling remediation.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On Cross-linguistic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the number and complexity of rules, the number of exceptions, and sources of inconsistency of an orthography, the more difficult it is to impart this knowledge and to use it for the remediation of spelling deficits (Caravolas, 2005). For very complex orthographies like English, it has been argued that interventions concentrating on memorization strategies of whole-word letter sequences are more efficient than interventions focusing on the teaching complex rules and regularities (Dymock & Nicholson, 2017;Hilte & Reitsma, 2011). This implies that the interventional aspects will vary not only in their importance for a given orthographic system , but also in their applicability for spelling remediation.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On Cross-linguistic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learners' spelling problem can be addressed through strategies such as rule-based approach, multiple efforts, resource based, and brute force (Peterson, 2005). Several other previous works on vocabulary have recommended different strategies to lessen the learners' spelling problems (e.g., see Basner, 2011;Dymock & Nicholson, 2017;Jackson, Konza, Ben-Evans, & Roodenrys, 2003;Rashid, Yousuf, & Imran, 2012;Shankweiler & Lundquist, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the most popular strategy demonstrated to children was the ‘Look – Say – Cover – Write – Check’ method. Research on this strategy has been shown to be less effective in supporting spelling than teaching rule‐based strategies, such as word study approaches (Dymock & Nicholson, 2017; Fisher et al, 2007). The ‘Look – Say – Cover – Write – Check’ strategy incorporates visual memorisation strategies and teachers may be constrained in shifting instructional methods from the memorisation model owing to gaps in their own understanding of the English Language (Fresch, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%