2015 European Control Conference (ECC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2015.7330666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To wait or to drop: On the optimal number of retransmissions in wireless control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where t k is the generation time slot of the latest sensor's estimation that is successfully received by the receiver before time slot (k + 1), 6 and q k ≥ 0. As it is straightforward that…”
Section: Harq-based Remote Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where t k is the generation time slot of the latest sensor's estimation that is successfully received by the receiver before time slot (k + 1), 6 and q k ≥ 0. As it is straightforward that…”
Section: Harq-based Remote Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retransmission is required by conventional communication systems with nonreal-time backlogged data to be perfectly delivered to the receivers. Also, energy-constrained remote estimation systems and the ones with low sampling rate can also benefit from retransmissions, see e.g., [5] and [6]. It seems that retransmissions may not improve the performance of a missioncritical real-time remote estimation system [7], which is not mainly constrained by energy nor sampling rate, as it is a waste of transmission opportunity to transmit an out-of-date measurement instead of the current one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retransmission is required by conventional communication systems with non-real-time backlogged data to be perfectly delivered to the receivers. Also, energy-constrained remote estimation systems and the ones with low sampling rate can also benefit from retransmissions, see e.g., [6] and [7]. It was shown in [8] that retransmissions cannot improve the performance of a mission-critical real-time remote estimation system, which is not mainly constrained by energy nor sampling rate, as it is a waste of transmission opportunity to transmit an out-of-date measurement instead of the current one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of data-acquisition characteristic also appears in networked control context as data loss, or 'dropouts', see, for instance, Demirel (2015), Gommans, Heemels, Bauer, andvan de Wouw (2013), Quevedo, Silva, andGoodwin (2008) and Schenato et al (2007) and the references therein. Many of those works consider data loss/acquisition with the purpose of analyzing the trade-off between control and communication rate when controlling, or 'scheduling', when and how often to (re-)transmit, in order to reduce or limit the communication rate (Al-Areqi, Görges, Antunes & Heemels, 2014;Antunes, Heemels, Hespanha, & Silvestre, 2012;Demirel, Aytekin, Quevedo, & Johansson, 2015;Kouchiyama & Ohmori, 2010;Molin & Hirche, 2009;. Other papers considering trade-offs between different characteristics of data-processing and communication are (Demirel, 2015;Wu, Lou, Chen, Hirche & Kuhnlenz, 2013) and Wu, Jia, Johansson and Shi (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%