Vegetated buffer strips (VBS) are recognized as a cost-effective way to reduce agricultural nonpoint-source pollution. In agroecosystems with high field fragmentation, only narrow VBS that partially compromise farmers' revenue are accepted. This study aimed to identify some ecosystem services as provided by VBS in terms of soil and water quality, and VBS performance in terms of wood for energy purposes. Buffer strip design (3 vs. 6 m wide) and composition were considered to define best practices for wood use at the farm level and for the local firewood market. Results showed that yearly wood pole production was 0.5 t 100 m −1 , on average, ranging between a minimum of 0.22 t 100 m −1 and a maximum of 0.72 t 100 m −1 per row. Wood production had negligible effects on farmers' revenue. By contrast, water quality was enhanced, especially with 6-m-wide VBS. Specific subsidies for the maintenance of VBS increased total income despite a reduction in crop production (−17.5% in 6-m VBS with two rows). Subsidies might be better quantified at a site-specific level by taking into account all ecosystem services that are provided by VBS. Promising solutions to increase farmers' income are related to the wood seasoning process for firewood production; reducing the moisture content to <25% before the start of the winter season increases its market value.Abbreviations: 3G, 3-m-wide buffer formed by grass only; 3G1R, 3-m-wide buffer with grass cover and a row of shrubs and trees; 6G1R, 6-m-wide buffer with grass and a row of shrubs and trees; 6G2R, 6-m-wide buffer with grass and two rows of shrubs and trees; RDP, Rural Development Programme; SOC, soil organic carbon; TSS, total suspended solids; VBS, vegetated buffer strip(s).