2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10181-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To: -) or to ☺, that is the question: a study of students’ initial impressions of instructors’ paralinguistic cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, emoji use is not always perceived as appropriate or suitable across contexts [24,25]. For example, Vareberg and Westerman [26] have shown instructors may be evaluated as more caring, but as less competent, by students when they use emoji. Similarly, Glikson and colleagues [27] showed that the sender of a message that included (vs. did not include) an emoji in a formal (vs. informal) setting was perceived as less competent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, emoji use is not always perceived as appropriate or suitable across contexts [24,25]. For example, Vareberg and Westerman [26] have shown instructors may be evaluated as more caring, but as less competent, by students when they use emoji. Similarly, Glikson and colleagues [27] showed that the sender of a message that included (vs. did not include) an emoji in a formal (vs. informal) setting was perceived as less competent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In working with students online, Vareberg and Westerman (2020) found that when instructors use the CMII cue of emoticons, they consistently yield higher perceived immediacy with their students. Kelly and Westerman’s (2016) review of perceived immediacy in distance education asserts that the greater instructor’s perceived immediacy with students, the more students feel that their instructor is a real person and resource to be utilized rather than a digital entity on the other side of the screen.…”
Section: Perceived Immediacymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Computer-mediated immediate behaviors, however, have only been studied for roughly a decade. Computer-mediated instructional immediacy (CMII) behaviors include behaviors such as personalizing electronic written messages by addressing the recipient by name and signing the messages (Kelly et al, 2010), inviting further communication (Kelly et al, 2010), affective language, and cohesive language (Christen et al, 2015), and appropriate use of emoticons and emojis (Vareberg & Westerman, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coinciding closely with the demarcation of perceived immediacy and the communicative behaviors that induce changes in perceived immediacy was the expansion of the idea of immediate behaviors beyond FTF cues and into computer-mediated interactions (Walther and Burgoon, 1992). Kelly et al (2010) posited the idea that computer-mediated immediate behaviors exist.…”
Section: Immediacymentioning
confidence: 99%