2020
DOI: 10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i1a.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To evaluate role of various clinical and diagnostics procedures in diagnosis of caecal perforation

Abstract: Study includes hundred patients admitted to surgical emergency with acute abdomen were selected for the study. There was not any preoperative selection criteria; the cases which were proven to be cases of perforation peritonitis on the basis of investigations and clinical examination were taken for study and considered for comparative study if laparotomy diagnosed to be case of caecal perforation. Inflammatory cause 22 cases (22%) which include caecal perforation secondary to ruptured liver abscess 14 cases, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?