2019
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2019.1699255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To assess smart manufacturing readiness by maturity model: a case study on Taiwan enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, Industry 4.0 is a broader concept than digitalization; although predicated on it, it more comprehensively envelops the current paradigm of changing organizational workings to those that are more connected, open, customer-oriented, and flat in organizational structure, reflecting the trends in global markets [ 9 ]. The phenomenon of Industry 4.0 was introduced in 2011 in Germany, which is the country that has led the implementation of Industry 4.0 principles and developed its economy through the integration of innovative technology into manufacturing processes [ 14 , 26 ]. Despite its introduction having occurred several years ago, it is still difficult to unambiguously define Industry 4.0 [ 7 , 42 ], because there is no agreement on whether it presents the next stage in the industrial revolution, a transformation of the way in which organizations develop, or a systematic change in strategy for the development of society [ 14 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More specifically, Industry 4.0 is a broader concept than digitalization; although predicated on it, it more comprehensively envelops the current paradigm of changing organizational workings to those that are more connected, open, customer-oriented, and flat in organizational structure, reflecting the trends in global markets [ 9 ]. The phenomenon of Industry 4.0 was introduced in 2011 in Germany, which is the country that has led the implementation of Industry 4.0 principles and developed its economy through the integration of innovative technology into manufacturing processes [ 14 , 26 ]. Despite its introduction having occurred several years ago, it is still difficult to unambiguously define Industry 4.0 [ 7 , 42 ], because there is no agreement on whether it presents the next stage in the industrial revolution, a transformation of the way in which organizations develop, or a systematic change in strategy for the development of society [ 14 , 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term Industry 4.0, however, most likely presents the German political agenda to transform its economy with the implementation of advanced technology not only in organizations, but also in society [ 52 ]. Despite this, it is evident that there are certain clusters of technologies that have formed and now drive ongoing digital transformation endeavors, which may also offer the most appropriate base for Industry 4.0 consideration in our study [ 1 , 53 ]: Internet of Things (IoT), which integrates various processes with information and communication technologies, cloud computing, smart objects, and machines, leading to cyber–physical systems [ 54 , 55 , 56 ]; Cyber–Physical Systems (CPS), which use advanced technologies, big data, and real-time two-way communications to control production (and broader business) processes and systems [ 57 , 58 ]; Smart Factories, which are smaller and decentralized production units that are digitalized and autonomous [ 26 ]. This stage of integration is resulting in processes being much more efficient and productive [ 59 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations