2022
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2022.2134171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Title: Boredom as a basis for fostering creativity in higher education: A call for pedagogical bravery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For further investigation of the association between boredom and creativity, the theories that postulate boredom as a disabling emotion that catalyses the generation of new ideas or as an approach orientation (Baas et al., 2008; Baird et al., 2012; Belton & Priyadharshini, 2007; De Dreu et al., 2008; Fink & Benedek, 2013; Mann & Cadman, 2014; Martindale, 1989), and theories of boredom as an affect that binds or inhibits cognitive processes and negatively influences creativity (Baas et al., 2008; Clore et al., 2001; O'Hanlon, 1981; Pekrun, 2006; Schwarz & Clore, 2003; Smith, 1981; Thackray, 1981; Wyer Jr. et al., 1999) should be examined in terms of the contextual informational influence of moods (Clore et al., 1994; Martin & Stoner, 1996; Schwarz & Clore, 1988) and their regulatory functions (Bandura, 1997; Elpidorou, 2014; Nett et al., 2010, 2011; Ryan & Deci, 2002). This could add to the body of research insights into the contextual conditions under which boredom as an achievement emotion is beneficial or inhibitory to creative performance (Craven & Frick, 2024; Daschmann et al., 2011; George & Zhou, 2002; Pekrun, 2017; Schwarz & Clore, 2003; Zhou & George, 2001). Furthermore, the interaction between affective state and personality in different contexts should be considered in predicting creativity (Akinola & Mendes, 2008; Chamorro‐Premuzic & Furnham, 2008; Farmer & Sundberg, 1986; Kashdan et al., 2004; Tamir, 2005; van der Zanden et al., 2020; Watt & Blanchard, 1994; Zenasni & Lubart, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further investigation of the association between boredom and creativity, the theories that postulate boredom as a disabling emotion that catalyses the generation of new ideas or as an approach orientation (Baas et al., 2008; Baird et al., 2012; Belton & Priyadharshini, 2007; De Dreu et al., 2008; Fink & Benedek, 2013; Mann & Cadman, 2014; Martindale, 1989), and theories of boredom as an affect that binds or inhibits cognitive processes and negatively influences creativity (Baas et al., 2008; Clore et al., 2001; O'Hanlon, 1981; Pekrun, 2006; Schwarz & Clore, 2003; Smith, 1981; Thackray, 1981; Wyer Jr. et al., 1999) should be examined in terms of the contextual informational influence of moods (Clore et al., 1994; Martin & Stoner, 1996; Schwarz & Clore, 1988) and their regulatory functions (Bandura, 1997; Elpidorou, 2014; Nett et al., 2010, 2011; Ryan & Deci, 2002). This could add to the body of research insights into the contextual conditions under which boredom as an achievement emotion is beneficial or inhibitory to creative performance (Craven & Frick, 2024; Daschmann et al., 2011; George & Zhou, 2002; Pekrun, 2017; Schwarz & Clore, 2003; Zhou & George, 2001). Furthermore, the interaction between affective state and personality in different contexts should be considered in predicting creativity (Akinola & Mendes, 2008; Chamorro‐Premuzic & Furnham, 2008; Farmer & Sundberg, 1986; Kashdan et al., 2004; Tamir, 2005; van der Zanden et al., 2020; Watt & Blanchard, 1994; Zenasni & Lubart, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%