2007
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue response around silicon nitride implants in rabbits

Abstract: The chemical and dimensional stability associated with suitable fracture toughness and propitious tribological characteristics make silicon nitride-based ceramics potential candidates for biomedical applications, mainly as orthopedic implants. Considering this combination of properties, silicon nitride components were investigated in relation to their biocompatibility. For this study, two cylindrical implants were installed in each tibia of five rabbits and were kept in the animals for 8 weeks. During the heal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson et al showed osseous penetration of up to 3 mm in ∼72% porous Si 3 N 4 with excellent vascularization twelve weeks after implantation in an ovine model [105]. Similar studies by Guedes e Silva et al showed good boney apposition for Si 3 N 4 samples in rabbits evaluated eight weeks after implantation [103,104]. In Wistar rats, Webster et al compared the osseointegration of Si 3 N 4 , PEEK, and titanium, reporting that Si 3 N 4 had improved osseointegration over the other two biomaterials at alltime points up to 3 months post-operatively, both under aseptic conditions and when implants were pre-inoculated with 10 4 S. epidermidis [106].…”
Section: Osseointegrationmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anderson et al showed osseous penetration of up to 3 mm in ∼72% porous Si 3 N 4 with excellent vascularization twelve weeks after implantation in an ovine model [105]. Similar studies by Guedes e Silva et al showed good boney apposition for Si 3 N 4 samples in rabbits evaluated eight weeks after implantation [103,104]. In Wistar rats, Webster et al compared the osseointegration of Si 3 N 4 , PEEK, and titanium, reporting that Si 3 N 4 had improved osseointegration over the other two biomaterials at alltime points up to 3 months post-operatively, both under aseptic conditions and when implants were pre-inoculated with 10 4 S. epidermidis [106].…”
Section: Osseointegrationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Si 3 N 4 has been shown to be biocompatible, possessing favorable cell interaction characteristics [83,84,[97][98][99][100][101][102]. These and other studies indicate that porous or unpolished Si 3 N 4 osteointegrates with adjacent bone [102][103][104][105][106] and exhibits bacteriostasis [106,107] . In its dense and polished form, it has been shown to produce implants with exceptionally low wear rates [108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118].…”
Section: Silicon Nitridementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Si 3 N 4 is a synthetic nonoxide ceramic that is used in many industrial applications, and has been investigated or adapted as a biomedical material since 1989. 10,12,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] The rationale for using Si 3 N 4 -based implants in skeletal reconstruction is based on its favorable combination of mechanical strength, microstructure, and cytotoxicity. 12,41 Polished and porous implants made of Si 3 N 4 have shown encouraging outcomes in spine and maxillofacial surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When viewed under CT and MRI, silicon nitride generates no artifacts11 and is semitransparent under X‐ray 4. Multiple studies have evaluated local and systemic biological responses to silicon nitride in cell culture and animal models and have found it to be biocompatible 12–19. Previous studies have reported the successful use of silicon nitride implants as bone void fillers16 and osteofixation plates17 in animals, and in humans as intervertebral body spacers 19…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Multiple studies have evaluated local and systemic biological responses to silicon nitride in cell culture and animal models and have found it to be biocompatible. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Previous studies have reported the successful use of silicon nitride implants as bone void fillers 16 and osteofixation plates 17 in animals, and in humans as intervertebral body spacers. 19 Because of this combination of mechanical and imaging properties, implants made of silicon nitride have the strength to support biomechanical loads and may allow more effective postoperative evaluation of the bone-implant interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%