2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02524010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue eosinophilia: A valuable marker in assessing stromal invasion, locoregional recurrence & distant metastasis in head & neck squamous cell carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, these are gallbladder counterparts of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 1 biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms, 1 and intraampullary papillary tubular neoplasms. 1,[38][39][40][41] In addition, both the study group and a control group (composed of 50 cases randomly selected from the excluded cases without any squamous differentiation) were analyzed for the following parameters: histological grade (well, moderate or poor, as determined by conventional approach), vascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor giant cells and the amount of 'tumor-infiltrating' inflammatory cells (eosinophils and lymphocytes) as defined in other studies; [42][43][44] ie, those associated preferentially with the tumor (in the vicinity of the tumor, in between the tumor cells or immediately adjacent to tumor cell clusters). The inflammation was semiquantitatively scored as 0 ¼ none, 1 ¼ minimal, 2 ¼ moderate and 3 ¼ marked, and subsequently grouped for comparison purposes as negligible (0 and 1) and significant (2 and 3).…”
Section: Histopathological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, these are gallbladder counterparts of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 1 biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms, 1 and intraampullary papillary tubular neoplasms. 1,[38][39][40][41] In addition, both the study group and a control group (composed of 50 cases randomly selected from the excluded cases without any squamous differentiation) were analyzed for the following parameters: histological grade (well, moderate or poor, as determined by conventional approach), vascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor giant cells and the amount of 'tumor-infiltrating' inflammatory cells (eosinophils and lymphocytes) as defined in other studies; [42][43][44] ie, those associated preferentially with the tumor (in the vicinity of the tumor, in between the tumor cells or immediately adjacent to tumor cell clusters). The inflammation was semiquantitatively scored as 0 ¼ none, 1 ¼ minimal, 2 ¼ moderate and 3 ¼ marked, and subsequently grouped for comparison purposes as negligible (0 and 1) and significant (2 and 3).…”
Section: Histopathological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Similarly, Alrawi et al established amplified eosinophil number in aggressive tumor compared to noninvasive tumors of head and neck region. [13] Hence, TATE shows dual nature of tumor promoting and tumor inhibiting activity.…”
Section: Eosinophils In Diseases Role Of Eosinophils In Precancer Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Некоторые авторы отмечают наличие связи тканевой эозинофилии с благопри-ятным прогнозом заболевания и увеличе-нием 5-летней выживаемости пациентов с опухолевой патологией [2,3]. Вместе с тем, в литературе есть сведения о способ-ности эозинофилов обеспечивать процесс ремоделирования тканей и, напротив, со-действовать развитию и прогрессированию опухоли [4,5].…”
unclassified