2012
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2011.2169672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tip of the Tongue Selectivity and Motor Learning in the Palatal Area

Abstract: This study assessed the ability of the tongue tip to accurately select intraoral targets embedded in an upper palatal tongue-computer interface, using 18 able-bodied volunteers. Four performance measures, based on modifications to Fitts's Law, were determined for three different tongue-computer interface layouts. The layouts differed with respect to number and location of the targets in the palatal interface. Assessment of intraoral target selection speed and accuracy revealed that performance was indeed depen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies should evaluate the suggested method in relation to activities of daily living and through more standardized assessment methods [23] including e.g. assessment of throughput [21, 24] and the path efficiency [25]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future studies should evaluate the suggested method in relation to activities of daily living and through more standardized assessment methods [23] including e.g. assessment of throughput [21, 24] and the path efficiency [25]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implementation was used to demonstrate that the user had full control of each of the seven actuators used in the robot. The mapping was performed based on knowledge from previous studies of the tongue control system showing that sensors at the front of the palatal area are easier to reach than sensors at the back of the palatal area [21, 22]. This control scheme was used by the abled-bodied experimental participant, E1.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several tongue control systems have been suggested, [12][13][14]16] including a new inductive approach for tongue interfacing, [12] and in addition a magnetic approach was introduced. [13] The inductive system has been further developed to comprise up to 24 sensors in a partly intraoral version [17] while the magnetic system has up to six virtually active areas/sensors. [18] These systems do not require physical contact between the tongue and the sensors and, therefore, may compensate for the drawbacks of using force sensitive sensors in the interface as in the system used by Lau et al [15] Still there are issues to be addressed in order to develop efficient and acceptable tongue computer interfaces (TCI).…”
Section: Tongue Computer Interfaces; Environmental Control; Neuro Rehmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 shows a comparison of the two layout designs proposed in this paper with the design of the mouse pad of the system already developed [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Proportional control allows a fine tuning in real time of values of a variable, such as the length or direction of a vector.…”
Section: B Activation Of Inductive Sensors and The Path Of Maximal Amentioning
confidence: 99%