2016
DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1217084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and functional demonstration of a wireless intraoral inductive tongue computer interface for severely disabled persons

Abstract: The results suggest that this inductive tongue computer interface provides an esthetically acceptable and functionally efficient environmental control for a severely disabled user. Implications for Rehabilitation New Design, Implementation and detection methods for intra oral assistive devices. Demonstration of wireless, powering and encapsulation techniques suitable for intra oral embedment of assistive devices. Demonstration of the functionality of a rechargeable and fully embedded intra oral tongue controll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Mohammadi et al [23] have developed a high-resolution tongue-based joystick for the tongue control interface first proposed in [24]. The tongue interface (an adapted version of the commercially available tongue control system, iTongue © [25]) contains 18 different inductive sensors [26] and thereby has the potential to control the robot without using different modes, as has been shown in [13], [25], and [26]. Mohammadi et al have also shown that controlling an ARM using a joystick like tongue based command is more effective than using discrete buttons for control [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Mohammadi et al [23] have developed a high-resolution tongue-based joystick for the tongue control interface first proposed in [24]. The tongue interface (an adapted version of the commercially available tongue control system, iTongue © [25]) contains 18 different inductive sensors [26] and thereby has the potential to control the robot without using different modes, as has been shown in [13], [25], and [26]. Mohammadi et al have also shown that controlling an ARM using a joystick like tongue based command is more effective than using discrete buttons for control [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Grand average topological plots of the Alpha [8][9][10][11][12][13] Hz and Beta [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Hz bandpower at movement onset, for the four different movement types averaged across all subjects and all trials. The power was calculated as meansquare of the bandpass filtered signal, referenced to common average reference, from 0.5 seconds before until movement onset.…”
Section: ) Movement Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it showed a new control option, it requires physical tongue movements similar to other proposed tongue control interfaces that achieve Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark (e-mail: rlk@hst.aau.dk; naja@hst.aau.dk). The authors T. Warburg Johansson and M. Jochumsen are with the Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark (e-mail: tjohan16@student.aau.dk; mj@hst.aau.dk) Feature-and classification analysis for detection and classification of tongue movements from single-trial pre-movement EEG Rasmus L. Kaeseler, Tim Warburg Johansson, Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk, and Mads Jochumsen I a higher performance [16], [17], [25], [26]. Furthermore, individuals with LIS will require a different system as these individuals have limited to no tongue movement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants controlled the EXOTIC Exo using an ITCI. The ITCI (Figure 2) consists of a mouthpiece unit (MPU), an activation unit (AU), and a central unit (CU) (Struijk et al, 2017). The MPU is a dental retainer encompassing 18 inductive sensors arranged in two printed circuit boards (PCB).…”
Section: Intraoral Tongue-computer Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intraoral tongue-computer interface (ITCI) (Struijk et al, 2017) provides 18 input commands and has a commercially available version for individuals with tetraplegia (ITongue, TKS). An assistive robotic manipulator with seven degrees of freedom was previously interfaced with the ITCI and enabled a participant with complete tetraplegia to perform tasks with the robot (Andreasen Struijk et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%