2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12901-016-0029-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tinnitus- related distress: evidence from fMRI of an emotional stroop task

Abstract: BackgroundChronic tinnitus affects 5 % of the population, 17 % suffer under the condition. This distress seems mainly to be dependent on negative cognitive-emotional evaluation of the tinnitus and selective attention to the tinnitus. A well-established paradigm to examine selective attention and emotional processing is the Emotional Stroop Task (EST). Recent models of tinnitus distress propose limbic, frontal and parietal regions to be more active in highly distressed tinnitus patients. Only a few studies have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complementing the current findings, there is rich evidence showing exaggerated emotional Stroop interference at the behavioral level across a variety of patient populations (Bar-Haim et al, 2007;Cox et al, 2006;Epp et al, 2012;Field et al, 2009;Williams et al, 1996). Moreover, evidence from recent brain imaging studies has suggested a common neurobiological substrate across psychopathological disorders (Goodkind et al, 2015;McTeague et al, 2017;Sha et al, 2017;Sprooten et al, 2017). For instance, McTeague et al (2017) identified a common neural circuit (e.g., dlPFC) disruption across psychiatric diagnoses and cognitive control tasks that parallels the currently observed cognitive control network.…”
Section: Trans-diagnostic Pattern Of Hyper-activation and Clinical Sisupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complementing the current findings, there is rich evidence showing exaggerated emotional Stroop interference at the behavioral level across a variety of patient populations (Bar-Haim et al, 2007;Cox et al, 2006;Epp et al, 2012;Field et al, 2009;Williams et al, 1996). Moreover, evidence from recent brain imaging studies has suggested a common neurobiological substrate across psychopathological disorders (Goodkind et al, 2015;McTeague et al, 2017;Sha et al, 2017;Sprooten et al, 2017). For instance, McTeague et al (2017) identified a common neural circuit (e.g., dlPFC) disruption across psychiatric diagnoses and cognitive control tasks that parallels the currently observed cognitive control network.…”
Section: Trans-diagnostic Pattern Of Hyper-activation and Clinical Sisupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This ALE map is assessed against a null-distribution of random spatial associations between studies using a non-linear histogram integration algorithm (Eickhoff et al, 2012;Turkeltaub et al, 2012). In addition, the average non-linear contribution of each experiment for each cluster was calculated from the fraction of the ALE values at the cluster with and without the respective experiment (Eickhoff et al, 2016). Based on the calculated contribution, we employed an additional two criteria to select significant clusters: (1) the contributions to one cluster were from at least two experiments to prevent the findings from being driven by the results from a single study; and (2) the average contribution of the most dominant experiment (MDE) did not exceed 50%, and the average contribution of the two most dominant experiments (2MDE) did not exceed 80% (Eickhoff et al, 2016).…”
Section: Main Activation Likelihood Estimation (Ale) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be possible that the severity and frequency of tinnitus‐related emotional states (distress and depression) in the two tinnitus groups are significantly different. New insights into the neurobiology of tinnitus suggest that neuronal changes occur not only on the classical auditory pathways but also on the insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and (para) hippocampus (PHC; Golm, Schmidt‐Samoa, Dechent, & Kroner‐Herwig, ; Joos et al., ; Simonetti & Oiticica, ). These neuroanatomical changes play a specific role in both tinnitus‐related emotional state disorder and cognitive deficits (Araneda et al., ; Kraus & Canlon, ; Simonetti & Oiticica, ; Vanneste et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain activity of high- and low-distress tinnitus patients has also been investigated during fMRI cognitive/emotional tasks. Patients with high distress (compared to low-distress) tinnitus showed increased activation in the left mid frontal gyrus in response to tinnitus-related sounds versus neutral sentences [ 72 ], or in the right insula and orbitofrontal cortex in the tinnitus-related sounds versus neutral words contrast [ 73 ]. Decreased activation of the frontal areas in patients with more bothersome tinnitus, relative to those who do not suffer from it so much, was found when they listening to affective sounds not associated with tinnitus [ 74 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%